Butch Femme Planet

Butch Femme Planet (http://www.butchfemmeplanet.com/forum/index.php)
-   Canada Forums (http://www.butchfemmeplanet.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=80)
-   -   Canadian breaking news and politics and hats and general sexiness (http://www.butchfemmeplanet.com/forum/showthread.php?t=2479)

Truly Scrumptious 12-30-2011 09:45 PM

Does it matter if our laws are passed illegally?
 
From The Globe And Mail today:

On Dec. 15, the Governor-General gave royal assent to Bill C-18. This means that the Marketing Freedom for Grain Farmers Act, the legislation that ends the Wheat Board’s monopoly of wheat and barley sales, is now the law of Canada – or is it?

The question arises because on Dec. 7, Federal Court judge Douglas Campbell ruled that the way Bill C-18 was introduced into Parliament violated the Canadian Wheat Board Act. Section 47 of the act requires that the Minister of Agriculture not introduce in Parliament a bill that would end the Wheat Board’s control of all wheat or barley sales without first consulting the board and holding a vote to determine whether farmers favour such a change.

In the May election, the Conservatives ran on a platform that promised to end the Wheat Board’s monopoly. When polls indicated that a majority of both wheat and barley farmers favoured retaining the Wheat Board’s “single desk,” the government realized it might fail to honour its election commitment if it followed the procedure laid down in the act.

The government could have avoided this issue by asking Parliament to repeal the entire Wheat Board Act, or at least Section 47. Instead, it took the position that it did not have to comply with the act’s requirements because one Parliament cannot bind another. So, in its view, it could simply ignore legislation passed by a previous Parliament.


Read more here:
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/...rticle2286544/

Truly Scrumptious 01-05-2012 07:30 PM

The Clash for the Cash: CEO vs Average Joe
 
As of noon on January 3, Canada’s 100 highest paid CEOs have already pocketed $44,366. It takes the Average Joe an entire year, working full-time, to earn that same amount.



Truly Scrumptious 01-06-2012 06:46 PM

Canada's worst customer service
 
Marketplace returns tonight on CBC at 8pm EST, with a story on the worst customer service in the country. It's hard to imagine there could be a rival for the absolute lack of anything resembling customer service here in Montreal, but I'll keep an open mind!

http://www.cbc.ca/marketplace/includ...omo_canada.jpg

EnderD_503 01-07-2012 07:39 AM

^ Honestly, I saw the ad for the new Marketplace in the lunchroom at work yesterday...and in a way kind of pissed me off. I wish there was a show that revealed how horribly employees are treated by customers. A lot of times when customers claim that employees are "rude" to them, it's because the customer was more than rude from the get go. I've had customers make racist comments about my co-workers, sexist comments about my co-workers, I've heard all kinds of homophobic comments by customers who "aren't getting what they want," and yeah I might act a little "frigid" toward them because my company won't allow me to outright refuse service to the jackasses...which I would if it didn't jeopardise my job. Honestly, I feel more companies should be like Ikea where they allow you to refuse service to customers who are more than distasteful as far as their treatment of employees. Maybe then, people would get better customer service. Keep your employees happy by empowering them to refuse service to some idiot who sees fit to cuss up a storm just because they think you should be licking their boots.

Let's face it, Canadian society is not as "polite" as we claim to be, and when people go shopping they can often be downright assholes. A lot of the employees they deal with are getting paid minimum wage in a shit job where they are regularly treated like crap by both customers and their employers. If I'm going to work a job where I get treated like a piece of shit on the bottom of a customer's shoe, they're going to have to pay me more than minimum wage, and the government should at least raise minimum wage rates to an amount that actually allows people to survive and not have to work more than one job.

Marketplace claims to be "protecting Canadians" yet fails to realise that its a lot of low income folks that get stuck in these jobs that are accused of "not giving good customer service." Fuck that. When I go out to a store I actually make sure to treat employees there with respect because I know what they have to deal with a hundred times a day...and in return I get respect back the majority of the time. Yes, there are some people that just don't give a shit, but I'd say they aren't the majority.

Cin 01-07-2012 10:04 AM

I don't know anything about Market Place. This was the first time I've ever watched the show and it did clear up something for me. I always wondered if the rather rude treatment I would receive from many store clerks was a uniquely Quebec thing, or even a Montreal thing, or perhaps a French thing, which I doubted since many store employees were not French, although it might be cultural, an unconscious mindset that seeped into the psyche of all customer service employees. What watching the show last night did for me was make it clear that the 'I'm blind to your existence' thing that I experience from most employees in most stores appears to be Canada wide. I've never made a racist, sexist or homophobic comment about anyone, let alone a store employee that I was trying to get help from. I was certainly never rude from the get go. But I've been treated so poorly, so often, that I've learned not to bother asking for help.

However, there are other aspects that would fall under the umbrella of poor service that I've never experienced outside of Quebec, although having only shopped in Ontario and Nova Scotia, I don't know if i have enough data to make that claim as reality. It's just been my experience.

In Montreal I've learned to jump out of the way when employees are walking down the aisles with stock that they are replenishing the shelves with. I've been hit on three separate occasions and never received as much as an "I'm sorry." As a matter of fact I was screamed at and followed around a grocery store by an employee who was angry because I complained that he hit me with a pallet of groceries.

I've also given up trying to look at anything where an employee is putting up stock. In the Dollarama I was trying to reach something just behind two employees with a cart who were reticketing some items. I explained I needed to get something and asked if they could move the cart just a tad. They were talking to each other and just ignored me. I reached over the cart to grab the article I wanted to purchase and one of the clerks pushed the cart into my arm and scrapped the skin on my forearm. I complained but they continued to ignore me. I told the woman she had scraped my arm and it was bleeding. She just started to talk to the other women and continued to ignored me. I couldn't understand the language they were speaking so I don't know if they were talking about me or about the weather. I kept on pointing to my arm and saying that she had hurt me. Finally she said and I quote, "Well, you shouldn't have tried to reach around the cart." I went to find a manager. When I did find the manager, I explained what happened. She looked blankly at me and my arm, didn't offer any advice, any sympathy for my experience, or even a band-aid. However, when it was clear I wasn't going anywhere until somebody addressed my issue, she asked if I had told the clerk I needed her to move. I said I did but she ignored me, just like she did when I complained about how she scraped my arm with the cart. And then she blamed me for reaching over her cart even though I had no way of knowing she would choose that exact moment to move the cart. I explained that a simple "oh, I'm sorry." would have ended it right there, I didn't even need a band-aid as I have some in my car. So the manager dutifully apologized in the most uninterested monotone one could imagine. Still since it was the first one I had ever received since coming to Montreal, it would do. Now I just walk on by if an employee is stocking or working around something I need. It just isn't worth it. Whatever I wanted to buy can wait or I can try to buy it some place else.

When I first moved to Montreal from Boston, other than the fact that people actually use their directionals, drive even faster than we do in Boston, and that Montreal is the only place in Quebec (maybe even in Canada) that you are not allowed to turn right on red because we can't be trusted, this rude thing from store clerks was the most different experience. And also the most jarring and difficult to get used to.

I get that people are overworked, that companies need to save money and put more work on their employees as a way to do it. I am always mindful of this. I am a working class stiff myself. I cut my teeth on dead end customer service type jobs and if I had not stumbled into human services and fallen in love with the population I work for, I would still be doing them. However, I have never treated anyone the way a large number of employees seem to feel comfortable treating me. I don't get it. And I don't deserve it.

And as far as not having the right not to serve customers, I certainly don't think that is the case here in Montreal. Everywhere I go, from grocery stores to hospitals, there are signs hung clearly explaining the kind of behavior they will not tolerate and can refuse service for. I was rather surprised when I came here and first saw these signs. I wondered to myself why would people have to tell other people not to swear, or be verbally or physically assaultive. Then I experienced how customers are treated, how frustrated you can get and I immediately understood the need for the signs everywhere. Although I believe simply treating people better might also work.

Truly Scrumptious 01-07-2012 10:15 AM

From the commercials for Marketplace, I thought the show was going to be about which cities had the worst customer service, not which stores. As for the 3 stores they chose to investigate, I have to say I think Zellers is the absolute worst. (Now, I can only speak to the service in Montreal though I have to say that we spent a week in Halifax a couple of months ago and had great service straight across the board.) Zellers here is atrocious. You have to fight to use a coupon (never mind what happened with their own coupons last week which was all over the news, that’s a special case), you have to fight to be charged the price listed under the product on the shelf, because they have a nasty habit of putting the wrong prices on the shelves, and it seems like every experience requires a guest appearance by the manager just to get them to honour their own policies.

Long ago I gave up ever expecting help finding anything in a store in Montreal, the clerks are few and far between and avoid you as much as they can, just as shown on Marketplace last night. So really, any complaints I have are not about that kind of help because if it exists here, I don’t know where. Walk into the Future Shop and try to get some help, and you will be disturbing the employees who are hanging out talking together. (Best Buy, on the other hand, is better. Weird, since they are the same company.) Ask for something at Walmart, and you will be treated to a shrug. Try to get some help at Canadian Tire, and you'll still be standing there an hour later waiting. Ask for something at a grocery store, and you will be told if they have it, it's on the shelf. Eventually you give up asking. If it takes me too long to find something, I am going somewhere else.

I wish Marketplace had investigated grocery stores. In Montreal, Loblaws is by far the worst, and as they also own Provigo and Maxi, it’s pretty hard to avoid them. Chances are when you walk down an aisle in Loblaws, an employee is going to be stocking shelves and blocking the aisle. You can either turn around, or you can stand there and wait, but he/she is not going to move, and if you ask him/her to do so just so that you can get what you need, you are going to be rebuffed. (By contrast, at the Atlantic Superstore in Halifax, a girl stocking the shelves saw me coming and said “let me get this out of your way”. I almost had a stroke.) Long check out lines at Provigo are the norm, one Saturday afternoon at 2pm in November, I counted 42 people in line, and there were only 2 registers open. I’m sure some of those people were angry by the time they got to check out, and I can’t even imagine how frustrating it is for the cashiers who have to handle that kind of volume of (annoyed) customers and I am always mindful of that . . . it is not the cashier’s fault when this happens. But still, it happens and the company clearly doesn’t care about anyone’s feelings, including their employees. (What I don’t understand is that Loblaws and Atlantic Superstore are the same company, so why is there such a contrast in their customer service?)

Loblaws stocks mostly President’s Choice products wherever possible, and with good reason . . . they make them, they are usually better than any other brands, and they are cheaper. But they seem to have absolutely no quality control . . . . we have had an alarming rate of incidents finding things like bones, pieces of what might be wood, and other debris in products that are not supposed to contain bones, pieces of wood, or other debris. And the thing is, they don’t give a crap. Call or write the head office, they are not one bit interested in resolving your complaint. You can bring it back to the store and they will replace it, but really, it would serve them much better if they just worked on their QC.

Honestly, the great customer service I see is in New York or Vermont when we go cross border shopping. The difference is startling. Maybe they have more employees, maybe they are better trained, I don’t know. I do know that it seems they want to make their customers happy, whereas here, it seems they just want to make you go away.

Cin 01-07-2012 10:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EnderD_503 (Post 499705)
^ Honestly, I saw the ad for the new Marketplace in the lunchroom at work yesterday...and in a way kind of pissed me off. I wish there was a show that revealed how horribly employees are treated by customers. A lot of times when customers claim that employees are "rude" to them, it's because the customer was more than rude from the get go. I've had customers make racist comments about my co-workers, sexist comments about my co-workers, I've heard all kinds of homophobic comments by customers who "aren't getting what they want," and yeah I might act a little "frigid" toward them because my company won't allow me to outright refuse service to the jackasses...which I would if it didn't jeopardise my job. Honestly, I feel more companies should be like Ikea where they allow you to refuse service to customers who are more than distasteful as far as their treatment of employees. Maybe then, people would get better customer service. Keep your employees happy by empowering them to refuse service to some idiot who sees fit to cuss up a storm just because they think you should be licking their boots.

Let's face it, Canadian society is not as "polite" as we claim to be, and when people go shopping they can often be downright assholes. A lot of the employees they deal with are getting paid minimum wage in a shit job where they are regularly treated like crap by both customers and their employers. If I'm going to work a job where I get treated like a piece of shit on the bottom of a customer's shoe, they're going to have to pay me more than minimum wage, and the government should at least raise minimum wage rates to an amount that actually allows people to survive and not have to work more than one job.

Marketplace claims to be "protecting Canadians" yet fails to realise that its a lot of low income folks that get stuck in these jobs that are accused of "not giving good customer service." Fuck that. When I go out to a store I actually make sure to treat employees there with respect because I know what they have to deal with a hundred times a day...and in return I get respect back the majority of the time. Yes, there are some people that just don't give a shit, but I'd say they aren't the majority.

You certainly make a good point. I know from experience that customers can be difficult and employers are generally unsympathetic. I remember getting suspended for three days at a job I had just out of high school where I worked as a telephone operator. A customer asked if this was the asshole operator and I said as polite as pie, "Why no sir. She went home at 5:30." It was just anther incident of my smart mouth, my supervisor explained, when they suspended me. It sucks how businesses don't care about their employees or their customers. Seriously, what can an employer expect an employee to say to a question like that?

I think businesses don't care about customer service that much because there's no reason for them to care. A good many of the corporations have close to a monopoly or share a monopoly with another corporation. In Montreal, grocery stores are all owned by the same two corporations. If you don't buy from one particular store because of some incident, you still have to buy groceries and chances are they will get your business anyway. Eventually it gets so you hate them all equally so you shop according to sales. You can't win so you learn to ignore the poor service. So they can cut back on how many employees they have on per shift with impunity. They put the burden right on the back of employees and the consequences of being served by overburdened employees right on their customers. And they continue to reap the profits. Pisses me off.

Truly Scrumptious 01-10-2012 08:14 PM

Build more prisons!
 

betenoire 01-10-2012 08:58 PM

I just need to put out there that I appreciate not being hassled by sales clerks when I am in a store. It makes me feel pressured and I will often leave instead of taking the time to browse and buy something.

For crissakes if I want help finding something I will go ask you for help, leave me alone.

betenoire 01-12-2012 10:17 AM

First: Abortion, gay marriage could be next on chopping block because of the Conservative government, Chrétien warns. Afterall - we've already pulled out of the Kyoto accord and aren't able to do gun control the way we need to do it.

My boyfriend Jean Chrétien. This is a very smart fund-raising effort on the part of the Liberals - I approve.

And, incidentally, he's absolutely fucking right because

Second: Some Lesbian couple from outside of Canada got married in Canada. Now they want a divorce and were unable to get one because Canada does not divorce non-residents. So instead of changing the rule to allow for divorces of ALL people married in Canada regardless of their country of residence...some douchebag government dude is all "well I guess since you can't get get divorced here and your country doesn't recognise your marriage anyway you're not really married and don't need a divorce - have a nice day!" And Harper is all "I promise I'm not going to bring same-sex marriage up for review!" - but I do not believe him.

and Third: Some shitstick backbencher is all "blah blah blah we have a duty to debate the rights of the unborn!"

I swear to blog, the Republican Primaries in the US are making Canadian Conservative act like bigger assholes.

betenoire 01-12-2012 10:59 AM

A series of studies in Canada and elsewhere over the past decade has found that the children of lesbians aren't just well-adjusted – they excel. On average, kids with two moms seem to be more confident and less aggressive than those raised by a mom and a dad. They are open-minded, affectionate and less susceptible to anxiety and depression.

EnderD_503 01-12-2012 07:15 PM

I hate how a lot of the comments on articles like this study take it out of its context.

Instead of looking at what there is to be said about families that are not made up of "oops babies" (as it was put in the article). Or families that may not put as much emphasis on certain forms of normativity/authoritarian gender roles, sexual expectations for the sake of normativity and so on. Or families who simply don't have parents who believe in being authoritarian for its own sake, due to parental insecurity or values affected by an unexamined patriarchal upbringing (do what daddy says because he says so and he's the boss, instead of do this because xyz).

Instead they rail on like traditionalists often do, which is to whine about how society is oppressing white men who just need everyone to fall into their proper roles damnit! And what do you mean my son doesn't need a male role model/father figure!? You can't raise a duck and tell it about duck stuff!!! :seeingstars:

EnderD_503 01-12-2012 07:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by betenoire (Post 502982)
I swear to blog, the Republican Primaries in the US are making Canadian Conservative act like bigger assholes.

I wish they would all just move down there to join their Tea Party/Republican buddies and leave us alone...:|

Soon 01-13-2012 10:52 AM

http://www.sorryworld.ca/

betenoire 01-13-2012 11:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HowSoonIsNow (Post 503558)

woo I posted that to my G+ last night

love it.

foxyshaman 01-13-2012 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by betenoire (Post 502982)

and Third: Some shitstick backbencher is all "blah blah blah we have a duty to debate the rights of the unborn!"

I swear to blog, the Republican Primaries in the US are making Canadian Conservative act like bigger assholes.

Interesting. I am sure we can agree that we will never ever see a repeal of the abortion laws in Canada.... and I am grateful otherwise I would be well on my way to Gramma. However, to nit pick, and I like nit picking sometimes, (I blame the Aries in me) I wish we could open the debate on fetus vs. living being insofar as wanting to give rights to an unborn child to be born safely. I would, in my perfect Aries world, love to see laws where if the mother is endangering the life of her unborn child, that we have the right to a) abort said fetus or b) confine her so that her gestating fetus has the right to a perfectly formed brain. And not one riddled with holes due to alcohol or drugs.

But, it is not a perfect Aries world.

betenoire 01-13-2012 12:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by foxyshaman (Post 503608)
Interesting. I am sure we can agree that we will never ever see a repeal of the abortion laws in Canada....

There ARE no abortion laws in Canada TO repeal. And that suits me just fine.

betenoire 01-13-2012 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by foxyshaman (Post 503608)
I wish we could open the debate on fetus vs. living being insofar as wanting to give rights to an unborn child to be born safely. I would, in my perfect Aries world, love to see laws where if the mother is endangering the life of her unborn child, that we have the right to a) abort said fetus or b) confine her so that her gestating fetus has the right to a perfectly formed brain. And not one riddled with holes due to alcohol or drugs.

No and no.

See the thing is - if the government meddles enough to call a fetus a person with rights and the government can control the behaviour of the mother...the government then gets to decide that a fetus is a person with rights who can not be aborted.

You can't have it both ways.

Either a fetus is not a person and I can have an abortion if I want one, or a fetus is a person and I am not allowed to have an abortion.

Cin 01-13-2012 02:04 PM

It is interesting to note that while there are no laws governing abortion in Canada, arguably a good thing, and that the Canada Health Act has been interpreted by the federal government as requiring provinces to fully fund abortion clinics, the reality is women seeking abortion in Canada, depending on their location, can be literally out of luck. Several provinces make it extremely difficult for women to get an abortion. New Brunswick pays nothing toward funding abortion clinics. Nova Scotia has very limited funding. It’s impossible to get an abortion in PEI, however, the province will pay for hospital abortions in other provinces, coincidentally (or not) hospitals in the Maritimes will not perform abortions on women from out – of – province. The only option available to women in PEI are expensive private clinics in NB or NS and that is only as long as they get service in 16 weeks. Other than that, they need to go to Montreal or Toronto.

The number of Canadian medical schools that give instruction in abortion procedures is decreasing, which could potentially create a shortfall in medical personnel skilled in this area. Third-trimester abortions are not generally available In Quebec women seeking third-trimester abortions are sent to the US.

Abortion is the only medical procedure in Canada that does not meet even the most basic requirements of the Canada Health Act, which states that “insured medical services must be universal, accessible, portable and comprehensive.”

Many poor and especially rural women must depend on hospitals, yet it is very difficult to obtain an abortion at a hospital for a variety of reasons. Only about 1/3 of hospitals actually perform abortions. Some hospitals put women through illegal approval processes. There are also quotas, parental consent for surgery on minors, and long waiting lists (yet most will only perform first trimester abortions.) Hospitals also require a doctor’s referral for an abortion, which can be difficult to obtain. Often women have to face anti-choice medical staff who disapprove of their decision.

British Columbia is the only province in the country to have an Access to Abortion Services, or a bubble zone law restricting anti-choice protesters from areas around clinics, doctor’s offices and homes. Other provinces make it incredibly difficult for a woman to obtain an abortion, although if you live in Montreal or Toronto finding a clinic isn’t difficult. In the prairie provinces access is concentrated in the larger cities. In the Yukon there are no private clinics, but the province pays part of the cost for a woman to travel to BC to obtain an abortion. In Nunavut, there is one hospital that provides tax-payer funded abortions but if a woman is pregnant past 13 weeks she must travel to Ottawa. In the Northwest territories there are no private clinics but abortions are provided at two out of the three hospitals there. Nationally there are 151 abortion facilities available as opposed to 197 of the so called crisis pregnancy centres.

In conclusion I must say that although obtaining an abortion in Canada is not a crime, depending on where you live it might just feel like one.

foxyshaman 01-13-2012 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by betenoire (Post 503620)
No and no.

See the thing is - if the government meddles enough to call a fetus a person with rights and the government can control the behaviour of the mother...the government then gets to decide that a fetus is a person with rights who can not be aborted.

You can't have it both ways.

Either a fetus is not a person and I can have an abortion if I want one, or a fetus is a person and I am not allowed to have an abortion.

I totally get that. I was musing out loud how in a perfect world we could protect the life of a fetus from a damaging set of circumstances. I work with damaged kids day and day out. I do realize, legally there is no way to accomplish this. Again, when I, the Supreme Aries, rule the world....:canadian:

foxyshaman 01-13-2012 03:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Miss Tick (Post 503668)
In conclusion I must say that although obtaining an abortion in Canada is not a crime, depending on where you live it might just feel like one.

Miss Tick, thank you for sharing your knowledge. I was aware of some of the information you provided, but not the extreme difficulties that some Canadian women face.

Again... thanks.

betenoire 01-14-2012 07:24 PM

NDP Leadership Race Q&A
 
I attended an NDP Leadership Race Q&A/Luncheon/Fundraiser today in my town. Unfortunately the only hopefuls able to make it were Peggy Nash and Romeo Saganash.

Those two are my favourites, however, so I was pretty satisfied.

(I sat at Ms Nash's table!)

I'm really very torn between the two of them, and not sure how I'll vote (if you're an NDP supporter but not yet a member I encourage you to join the party so that YOU can vote too!)

betenoire 01-14-2012 11:57 PM

Peggy Nash's Queer Politics

(Blog Post) Romeo Saganash and the White Left

Romeo Saganash on how to beat Stephen Harper

betenoire 01-26-2012 01:22 AM

I know this is very old and no longer breaking news. But I was reminded of it today and I wanted to share.

It was just so freaking funny! We need more of these sort of shenanigans, please.



tapu 01-26-2012 05:53 AM

.
.
.
Canada beware. The tapu is in-country this weekend.


My parole officer has been informed and the City of Montreal has been put on alert. The inconvenience caused to those of you who live there should be short: I am but passing through on my way to Ontario.

Also, for the citizens of New Hampshire and Vermont, I am allowed inside state lines, to pass through for my journey, but can make no stops except for gas adjacent to US routes.

Softhearted 01-29-2012 04:07 PM

"Shafia jury finds all guilty of 1st-degree murder
Verdict sends message, prosecutor says"

By Melinda Dalton, CBC News Posted: Jan 29, 2012 8:48 AM ET

Source:http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montre...ia-sunday.html

Truly Scrumptious 02-25-2012 06:16 AM

Demand answers and real consequences for robocall election fraud
 
Leadnow.ca is attempting to force by-elections in enough ridings to challenge the Conservative's majority government. Please sign and share!

524. (1) Any elector who was eligible to vote in an electoral district, and any candidate in an electoral district, may, by application to a competent court, contest the election in that electoral district on the grounds that
(a) under section 65 the elected candidate was not eligible to be a candidate; or
(b) there were irregularities, fraud or corrupt or illegal practices that affected the result of the election.


http://www.leadnow.ca/robocall-fraud

Cin 02-27-2012 08:29 AM

Ottawa’s Focus on Alberta Oilsands is Killing Manufacturing Jobs in Eastern Canada, Economists Say
by Antonia Zerbisias

You know that old saying, “When the U.S. sneezes, Canada catches a cold.”

It still applies. The United States remains our biggest trading partner. What happens there affects everything from our tourism to our exports.

But now, Canada is facing a bigger threat to its economic health.

It’s called Dutch Disease — and it’s complicated by Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s newly acquired China Syndrome. Stung by U.S. President Barack Obama’s rejection of the Keystone XL pipeline, Harper is looking to China’s government-owned oil companies.

Dutch Disease isn’t about tulips or wooden shoes or even sick elm trees. It’s about Canada’s steady conversion to a petro-state, fueled by the rapid development of Alberta’s oilsands. It means that, more and more, Canada’s economy will be subject to the price of oil.

Coined by The Economist in 1977, “Dutch Disease” describes what happened to the Netherlands after natural gas fields were discovered off its shores. The little country became so economically entangled with its resource industry, its manufacturing sector tanked.

“Ontario is probably the province that has suffered the most from this,” says University of Ottawa economist Serge Coulombe, co-author of a massive study on the impact of Dutch Disease on Canadian jobs, published last fall.

“The biggest losers are typically the white males who had all those great jobs in manufacturing, much like in the U.S.,” he says, adding that Canadian salaries and environmental standards make our manufactured exports less attractive, especially as our dollar strengthens. “If we want to compete with China we have to be very, very smart. It is very, very difficult.”

In his report, Coulombe and his co-researchers determined that our petro-currency was responsible for 42 per cent of job losses between 2002 and 2007. That translates to at least 140,000 manufacturing jobs gone as a direct result of the oilsands development.

It didn’t get any better after that. Our manufactured exports dropped another 12.6 per cent between the second quarter of 2007 and the first quarter of 2011.

If Dutch Disease is allowed to spread, Coulombe and other economists warn, Canada’s ailing manufacturing sector will face still more job losses, while consumers, farmers and non-oil producing industries will feel increasing pain through inflation and gas prices at the pump.

It all started when the price of oil started rising in 2002, tripling through the decade.

The long-unprofitable oilsands, which require the expensive and water-intense extraction of tarry bitumen, suddenly became economically feasible. That increased oilsands development boosted crude exports. By 2006, oil became our biggest export, displacing autos and auto parts. The loonie surged against the weakening U.S. dollar. That made our manufactured exports — long dependent on a low Canadian dollar — more expensive. And that cost factory workers jobs.

Over the past year, alarm bells have been sounding.

Last April, Montreal-based MRP Partners (Macro Research Board), an independent global investment research firm, warned of the “petrolization” of Canada.

“Canada has often been referred to in jest as the 51st state, due to its historical reliance on the U.S. as a key export market,” wrote MRB partner Phillip Colmar. “However, it is becoming more accurate to regard Canada as another Province of China.”

“You have 1.3 billion people right now that are growing at an unprecedented rate,” explains Coulombe. “That creates a huge demand for natural resources.”

And Harper is eager to meet that demand, saying it is “increasingly clear that it is in Canada’s national interest to diversify our energy markets.”

Over the past two years, China has invested some $15 billion in Alberta’s oilsands. It wants the bitumen moved via the Enbridge Northern Gateway Pipeline to the B.C. coast, where it will be loaded into tankers.

That crude, rated the dirtiest on earth, will travel through our most environmentally sensitive areas, critics charge.

Earlier this month, economist Robyn Allan submitted a 74-page analysis of the Northern Gateway proposal to the National Energy Board Joint Review Panel considering the project.

Allan, a former Insurance Corporation of British Columbia CEO, makes a case that, if the project is approved, the Canadian economy will be hit by “an inflationary oil price shock” — as well as interprovincial conflicts.

“Right now 95 per cent of the oil is in Alberta but 75 per cent of the manufacturing jobs are in Ontario and Quebec,” she says. “If you have a policy that deliberately supports Alberta at the expense of Eastern Canada, then you’re stretching the national fabric.

“The jobs are not there, the benefits to Canada are not there,” she maintains. “We are going to experience even more upward pressure on the Canadian dollar; we are going to have even more intense division between Eastern and Western Canada.”

Yet another study published last fall, this time by Montreal’s Institute for Research on Public Policy, emphasized that “resource booms don’t last forever” and that Canada should maintain a competitive manufacturing industry.

Economists suggest there are ways to cure Dutch Disease, or at least lessen its impact.

Canada could invest in other industries, including green technologies. Or it could go the foreign currency route, by investing abroad. That’s what Norway does with its oil wealth. By creating a petroleum fund with foreign currency, it also pays down its debt, which reduces the upward pressure on the krone and protects the country’s exports.

But, as Coulombe says, “We cannot do that in Canada because we have a sophisticated and complicated federal and provincial system and it is the provinces that own the natural resources.”

Alberta doesn’t seem particularly disposed to help Eastern Canada, which, ironically, imports most of its oil from the Middle East, Mexico and Norway.

“When the federal government talks about diversifying our markets, we shouldn’t be looking to northeast Asia, we should be looking to Canada,” says Allan. “We hear we have to diversify to Asia because Asia needs to protect its source of supply so it’s not dependent on Saudi Arabia. But Canada also has a dependency on Middle Eastern countries.

“So why are our federal leaders so concerned about everybody else’s oil security and not Canada’s? We should be looking at what we can do to help Eastern Canada avoid the unpredictable and volatile (prices) and perhaps supply restrictions that are going to happen in the years to come.”

Coulombe fears that little or nothing can or will be done to protect Canadian consumers and manufacturers from the effects of Dutch Disease.

“I don’t think the manufacturing sector will come back; I think we have to accept that,” says Coulombe. “The growth of China is like a big train. Canada will be more and more a country that will live on its natural resources.”

There’s another old Canadian expression, attributed to the late University of Toronto economist Harold Innis. He compared Canadians to “hewers of wood and drawers of water” because we were dependent for so long on exporting our raw materials to buy back value-added manufactured goods.

Today, we are selling our oil to buy back gasoline, jet fuel, asphalt, plastic and other petroleum-based products.

That would make us “deliverers of crude and drawers of water.”

Cin 02-29-2012 01:52 PM

BUMP
 
If you haven't signed this petition yet just click on the link.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Truly Scrumptious (Post 535366)
Leadnow.ca is attempting to force by-elections in enough ridings to challenge the Conservative's majority government. Please sign and share!

524. (1) Any elector who was eligible to vote in an electoral district, and any candidate in an electoral district, may, by application to a competent court, contest the election in that electoral district on the grounds that
(a) under section 65 the elected candidate was not eligible to be a candidate; or
(b) there were irregularities, fraud or corrupt or illegal practices that affected the result of the election.


http://www.leadnow.ca/robocall-fraud


Truly Scrumptious 03-07-2012 03:10 PM

Rallies all across the country this Sunday!
 
From DemocracyCanada:


We call on all Canadians to join in a PROTEST on Sunday, March 11, 1:00 - 4:00pm in every city across Canada. TIMES VARY BY CITY. PLEASE see list below.

We the people of Canada demand a FULL PUBLIC INQUIRY INTO ALL CALLING PRACTICES AND BY-ELECTIONS IN ALL AFFECTED RIDINGS!
Get Fraud out of Parliament NOW!
Events Date/Timess by CITY:

BRAMPTON: http://www.facebook.com/events/247656928655120/

CALGARY: http://www.facebook.com/events/279165258822521

CHARLOTTETOWN:

EDMONTON: http://www.facebook.com/events/400985336582256/

FORT ST JOHN, BC: Sunday March 11, 1-4pm @ Centennial Park. Link coming...

FREDERICTON:

GUELPH: Rally in Guelph on Sunday March 11 at 2 p.m. from St George's Square to City Hall ... link coming....

HALIFAX: https://www.facebook.com/events/404227776260456/

KINGSTON: http://www.facebook.com/events/197347437036133/

KITCHENER-WATERLOO:

KELOWNA: March 11, 1:00pm - 4:00pm, at the Sails - link to come!

KAMLOOPS: https://www.facebook.com/events/361277043892850/

LETHBRIDGE: Saturday, March 10, more detail coming...

LONDON, ON.: http://www.facebook.com/events/334163146634012/

MONTREAL: http://www.facebook.com/events/331388483564902/

NANAIMO: http://www.facebook.com/events/401321439884776/

NELSON,BC: http://www.facebook.com/events/199143646854401/

NORTH BAY,ON: http://www.facebook.com/events/201208559978692/

OTTAWA: http://www.facebook.com/events/339230162786113/

PETERBOROUGH: http://www.facebook.com/events/168997493216709/

REGINA: http://www.facebook.com/events/384485521579099/

ST. JOHN'S: http://www.facebook.com/events/385763404786355/

SASKATOON: http://www.facebook.com/events/188334024608977/

THUNDER BAY:

TORONTO: http://www.facebook.com/events/161404757312027/

VANCOUVER: http://www.facebook.com/events/345013878875538/

VICTORIA: http://www.facebook.com/events/183919385055445/

WINDSOR: http://www.facebook.com/events/253368638081506/

WINNIPEG: http://www.facebook.com/events/336790496356157/

YELLOWKNIFE: http://www.facebook.com/events/364168013615697/



http://www.facebook.com/events/181631648613672/

Soon 03-19-2012 09:22 AM

Foreign Affairs Issues Advisory for Travellers to Russia

http://www.voyage.gc.ca/countries_pa....asp?id=249000



Homosexuality is legal, though some still strongly disapprove of it. Canadians are advised to avoid displaying affection in public, as homosexuals can be targets of violence. A law prohibiting public actions propagandizing homosexuality, lesbianism, bisexuality and transsexuality among minors, and prohibiting public actions propagandizing pedophilia, came into effect in St. Petersburg on March 17th, 2012. Public actions (including dissemination of information, statements, displays or conspicuous behaviour) contradicting or appearing to contradict this law may lead to arrest, prosecution and the imposition of a fine. Similar laws are also in effect in Ryazan, Arkhangelsk and Kostroma.

Soon 03-19-2012 08:43 PM

it'll make you smile
 
She’s a Sens fan, her girlfriend’s a Leafs fan and their marriage proposal during NHL game was adorable (VIDEO)

foxyshaman 03-19-2012 10:49 PM

You were right, it did make me smile!!!

betenoire 03-20-2012 10:10 AM

NDP holds on to Toronto-Danforth / Gay lawyer Craig Scott to be part of the largest queer caucus in Canadian history

Linus 03-20-2012 01:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Truly Scrumptious (Post 535366)
Leadnow.ca is attempting to force by-elections in enough ridings to challenge the Conservative's majority government. Please sign and share!

524. (1) Any elector who was eligible to vote in an electoral district, and any candidate in an electoral district, may, by application to a competent court, contest the election in that electoral district on the grounds that
(a) under section 65 the elected candidate was not eligible to be a candidate; or
(b) there were irregularities, fraud or corrupt or illegal practices that affected the result of the election.


http://www.leadnow.ca/robocall-fraud


Does this mean I will get back my right to vote since Elections Canada has deemed that I no longer have a right to vote (even if the Canadian Constitution declares that I do)?

foxyshaman 03-20-2012 01:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Linus (Post 550326)
Does this mean I will get back my right to vote since Elections Canada has deemed that I no longer have a right to vote (even if the Canadian Constitution declares that I do)?

Why do you no longer have the right to vote?

Cin 03-20-2012 01:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Linus (Post 550326)
Does this mean I will get back my right to vote since Elections Canada has deemed that I no longer have a right to vote (even if the Canadian Constitution declares that I do)?

What does your right to vote, although you should of course have it, have to do with the robocall fraud?

girl_dee 03-20-2012 02:05 PM

Maybe off topic but a good piece of info
 
More than 130 beef products recalled 3

BY SHEENA GOODYEAR ,QMI AGENCY
FIRST POSTED: TUESDAY, MARCH 20, 2012 09:21 AM EDT | UPDATED: TUESDAY, MARCH 20, 2012 03:03 PM EDT

2.27 kg package of No Name club pack beef steakettes. (CFIA/HO)

Change text size for the storyPrint this story
Report an error
Related Stories
CFIA adds more beef products to recall list
E. coli fears prompt expanded recall of burgers
Recalled burgers may contain E. coli
Canada isn't doing enough to protect consumers from tainted food, says a prominent food safety expert on the heels of a major frozen beef recall.

"If the public thinks food inspections by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency are going to protect Canadians from contaminated food, think again. It's just not that way," said Richard Holley from the University of Manitoba.

Just as spring begins and Canadians start dusting off their barbecues, more than 135 kinds of frozen beef have been recalled in Canada because of E. coli fears. On Monday night, the Canadian Food Inspection Agency updated its list of beef recalls for the fifth time this month, following four updates in February.

These massive recalls — which include popular brands like President's Choice and Best Value — are possible, in part, because so much food in Canada comes from just a handful of companies, Holley said. The recalled beef, sold across Canada under a number of brands, all comes from the same food facility, Establishment 761 in Saskatoon.

"The businesses are getting larger and larger and they have a clientele that, in some instances, stretches right straight across the country," Holley said. "But when you have the capacity to have an extended shelf life of a product by freezing them, this sort of increases the scope of the recall."

Garfield Balsom, a food-recall specialist with the CFIA, said authorities decided to pull all products from Establishment 761 made between July 1, 2011, and Feb. 15, 2012, after one person reported getting sick.

"This is a lot of frozen beef that was manufactured way back in July 2011. Now something's wrong there. E. coli analysis takes, max, 10 days," Holley said.

Balsom said CFIA is trying to get to the root of the problem, but investigations of this scale are complex, and finding the cause of a contamination can be "extremely difficult."

Holley said CFIA only discovers the cause of outbreaks about 50% of the time.

He said in order to protect people from food-borne illness, Canada needs to focus more on prevention rather than relying on after-the-fact testing to catch outbreaks. Canada also needs to keep better data, he said.

"There are things in the system in need of repair and things we don't know and we have the will in Canada to address this. We don't know how many people die in Canada from eating tainted food. Nobody is charged with the responsibility of keeping that data."

The food industry isn't much safer now than it was during the 2008 listeria outbreak that killed 23 people, Holley said.

"There's too many holes in the system to have the assurance that this is not going to happen again," he said.

The full recall list, which can be found on the CFIA website, includes Best Value, President's Choice, Calgary Stampede, Country Morning Gold, No Name, Grillhouse, Heritage Angus Beef, Irresistibles, Keg, Maple Lodge Farms, Overwaitea, Our Finest, Q Burger, Prairie Heritage Producers, Simply Food, Sunspun, Spring Creek, Webers, Western Family and Zabiha Halal.

Food contaminated with E. coli might not look or smell spoiled, but it can cause severe abdominal pain and bloody diarrhea in healthy people. But for some people — especially children, the elderly and people with weakened immune systems — the effects can be serious and even fatal.

"Some people may have seizures or strokes and some may need blood transfusions and kidney dialysis. Others may live with permanent kidney damage. In severe cases of illness, people may die," the CFIA said.

foxyshaman 03-20-2012 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cajun_dee (Post 550331)
More than 130 beef products recalled 3...


This would not be such an issue if we still maintained local butchers and local abattoirs. The fact that thousands of animals go through establishment 761 in Saskatoon is, in large part, the problem. I am not sure how beef products, produced in such horrific conditions, (sanitary and humane conditions) could be safe. If one MUST eat meat, then one should go to the local farmer's market. I buy my kids their meat from a local farmer who takes it to his local butcher... the meat is better. And more importantly... safe. Oh and it tastes wwwaaayyyy better. I can't even imagine how many individual animals make one pkg of ground beef.

Thank you for posting that Cajun_dee. I don't eat meat, so I had NO IDEA this was going on today. <shudder>

girl_dee 03-20-2012 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by foxyshaman (Post 550339)
This would not be such an issue if we still maintained local butchers and local abattoirs. The fact that thousands of animals go through establishment 761 in Saskatoon is, in large part, the problem. I am not sure how beef products, produced in such horrific conditions, (sanitary and humane conditions) could be safe. If one MUST eat meat, then one should go to the local farmer's market. I buy my kids their meat from a local farmer who takes it to his local butcher... the meat is better. And more importantly... safe. Oh and it tastes wwwaaayyyy better. I can't even imagine how many individual animals make one pkg of ground beef.

Thank you for posting that Cajun_dee. I don't eat meat, so I had NO IDEA this was going on today. <shudder>

THIS is why i stopped eating meat years ago. my family was in the cattle industry, i know what it is supposed to be like, and this is not it.

dee


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:46 PM.

ButchFemmePlanet.com
All information copyright of BFP 2018