Quote:
Originally Posted by BullDog
I have only watched bits and pieces but the only straightforward answer I have seen is when Cory Booker asked if she condemned white supremacy and she did say yes.
Feinstein asked her if the president could delay the election under any circumstances. The answer is absolutely not, but Barrett wouldn't answer.
Klobuchar asked if it was illegal to intimidate voters at the polls. Of course, it is but she wouldn't answer, so Amy cited the specific law.
She is basically not answering any question at all.
I don't know much about originalism but times change lady. "All men are created equal" means something different now than it did in the 18th century. It's a crock of shit.
I thought Kamala Harris was outstanding yesterday.
Barret absolutely sucks. The worst hypocrite ever. If she really was a moral, honest person she would not agree to be shoved through during an election where people are already voting.
|
I tend to agree with you, Bulldog, especially with your assessment about her: "if she was an honest, moral person she would not agree to be shoved through".
I have watched some of the televised proceedings today. As a communications scholar, I find situations like this is rich with tell-tale non-verbal cues.
I think she is hyper focused on controlling her facial expressions, as well as not giving clear, concise messages orally.
But ...
which way are her feet pointing?
Lol, sometimes it is feet which betrays the real message intended for the listener or viewing audience.