Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperFemme
I feel the need to come back here and clarify.
The word breeder as uttered by Dylan and my reaction to that word have nothing to do with each other. Light years apart.
I didn't do a good job of making that clear, in fact I made it feel like Dylan was responsible for my reaction.
Dylan, I am sorry for that. I am also sorry for using the wrong pronoun. I was typing fast and hadn't realized I'd used "hy" rather than "he" in reference to you.
Suddenly I found myself in a place where I wanted to dig my heels in and that is not conducive to making sense. Si I apologize.
You can have your patriarchal cross reference.
I hope you in turn can understand how hurtful and erasing the term can be to me as a Femme.
This doesn't have to be an either or situation.  |
Thanks for your apology.
I understand exactly what you're saying about the term breeder feeling erasing and hurtful. As someone who is female-bodied, I get what you're saying, and I agree with you. Firie has already explained this isn't a word we use (in the sense you're speaking of).
My use of it was *intentional* and meant to be...er...um...what's the word I want...offensive I guess, because I DO find the way the patriarchy views women and grooms girls to be baby-making machines *offensive*.
Again, being that I was making a correlation between FLDS (which is a horribly misogynist society which openly treats women as such through numerous grooming techniques) and mainstream US/Western culture and the sexism/grooming therein, my use of the word was *intentional*
Yes, I agree 100% that the term is offensive...that's why I used it...it was the whole point of the original post...that it IS offensive the way girls are groomed
Dylan