Quote:
Originally Posted by evolveme
See, I saw this as problematic too, Jess. Even though you go on to say, "not for her support of me, but for the exact entity that she is."
While I love the love and respect you are showing her here, I also want to see you simply allow her the autonomy and agency she deserves (not that I believe you are necessarily disrespecting her). I understand that "the dance" has us thinking often of the bright space between us, the sharp contrast. But what was it about her that you loved before she was yours?
Who is she fundamentally? How can you define her without mentioning a role she inhabits (lover, sister, mother, friend)?
Tell us about her independent of you or even what she means to you.
I want to know if we are ever seen clearly enough in the skin we're in, or if we're always bleeding into our roles.
|
I don't allow her anything. She is, therefore, she deserves. She was a "strong, tender, gracious, protective, elegant, driven" woman BEFORE we met. This is whom I was attracted to then and it hasn't changed.
I knew my words would fail me and in an attempt to simply say thank you, THIS is how we can easily become silenced. ( Some folks asked for examples. Here is one). Sometimes, as it has been pointed out, we use different vernaculars or even "less words" to say something poignant. I said thank you, I will leave it at that.