Quote:
Originally Posted by Kam
they will be disarming America next, you lost your Internet privledges yesterday...
|
Oh, THAT would explain the SCOTUS decision striking down the Chicago handgun ban and expanding the right to purchase, own and carry a handgun? So, by making it easier to get a handgun Americans are going to be disarmed?
Quote:
|
forced vaccines with the "mark of the beast", no exceptions - see Lindsey Willams video In DVD 8, He talks about how we are being 'marked' with 'chips' by the vaccines, that the chips are put in the needles and are 'nano' in size. That the health care bill is about total government takeover, to read the fine print.
|
Okay, I didn't really take this when you last posted it so now I'm going to since you have twice repeated the same myth. Since you are going to throw around the term "nano" because it's unfamiliar to most of the people reading this, I'll have to explain what it is you're saying and why what you are saying is not currently possible.
Nano refers to nanometer (British nanometre). It is 1 billionth of a meter. This is extremely small. How small?
Going from smallest to largest:
Single carbon nanotube--1nm
A cell membrane is 6 - 10 nm in width.
HIV virus is about 90 nm across.
The wavelength of violet light is between 380 and 435 nm.
Red light is between 625 and 749 nm
A red blood cell is 1 micron across
A human hair is 100 microns across
So what you are saying is that we are, currently, capable of building electronic chips capable of sending out some kind of EMF signal (if you can't send a signal, what's the point of the chip) that are 1000 times SMALLER than a human hair! Really? And who won the Nobel Prize in Physics for inventing this technology because if such a chip exists then that person DEFINITELY deserves a Nobel prize. Kam, the smallest chip currently possible is 2.5 nm across. It is a logic gate so it has no power source or anything to make it freestanding. You are claiming that we have built a chip that is self-powered and and is so small that you need an electron microscope to even see it! You are also claiming that these chips are being put into vaccines and that these chips are capable of sending out EMF waves. What you are claiming is NOT technologically possible using current technology. Not. Possible. In another quarter century, if everything goes right, we MIGHT be able to build a self-contained chip that is only a nanometer or so across but we cannot do so now.
What's more, any signal that is small enough to be broadcast by such a chip would be so energetic that the person with such a chip implanted would be in VERY big trouble VERY quickly. Because we are talking about wavelengths on the alpha-particle scale. Nothing in a frequency used for communications is strong enough to make it out of the human body broadcast from such a chip and anything strong enough to do so would cause such immediate tissue damage as to be obvious within minutes of being introduced to the human body. This is for reasons having to do with quantum effects that I'm not going to get into here because it's just TOO arcane and technical. Suffice to say that the major problem here is that the wavelength of the signal is larger than the transmitter of the signal by a couple of orders of magnitude. In order for this chip to do send-receive (and if it is a tracking chip it needs to be able to do bidirectional) the *inbound* waves would have to be smaller than a nanometer otherwise the object will be invisible to the wave (the object will sit in the trough of the wave). The only candidates are X-rays and gamma rays. To imagine how ludicrous Kam's suggestion is. Imagine putting two objects in a stream of running water. One is a pebble and one is a rock--large enough to take effort to lift but still liftable, if only briefly, by a single adult. The pebble is so small that the waves will pass over the rock without being disturbed unless the waves are VERY energetic (short wavelength). The calmer (longer wavelength) the wave the more invisible the pebble. The rock, on the other hand will disturb the water with both energetic and low-energy waves because it is larger. What Kam is saying is that radio waves or microwaves (which are what are typically used for communications) can be used to send-receive with these nanochips even though the nanochips are pebbles in a stream of very low-energy waves. This violates a *fundamental* principle of electromagnetism.
So what you are saying is that in vaccines there are devices, living in non-vacuum conditions, that send-receive on the X-ray or gamma wave part of the EMF spectrum and which are *undetectable* even though they are pumping out highly energetic photons that do things like cause tissue damage, etc. (The reason why we use X-rays to peer inside of your body is that they are energetic enough to get past the skin. The reason why we dont' use gamma rays for the same purpose is that gamma rays are SO energetic that they start to cause serious problems with DNA breaking immediately. Kam is saying that people are being implanted with devices that have no other option than to use rays in that energy range.)
This violates so many *different* areas of basic physics and chemistry that I don't even know how to capture them all in anything less than book length.
Folks, what Kam is suggesting vis a vis the chips in vaccines is impossible at current technology and some of what is being suggested is impossible with ANY level of technology. IMPOSSIBLE. Like violation of the Second Law of Thermodynamics impossible. Perpetual motion machine impossible. Your broken glass spontaneously reassembling itself impossible. Your flat tire spontaneously reinflating impossible. Some of what Kam is suggesting is even less possible than THAT.