View Single Post
Old 07-23-2010, 08:00 PM   #22
firie
Timed Out

How Do You Identify?:
.
Relationship Status:
.
 

Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: .
Posts: 204
Thanks: 191
Thanked 469 Times in 128 Posts
Rep Power: 0
firie Has the BEST Reputationfirie Has the BEST Reputationfirie Has the BEST Reputationfirie Has the BEST Reputationfirie Has the BEST Reputationfirie Has the BEST Reputationfirie Has the BEST Reputationfirie Has the BEST Reputationfirie Has the BEST Reputationfirie Has the BEST Reputationfirie Has the BEST Reputation
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JustJo View Post
Hi Melissa,

I hear what you're saying...and my sympathies are with this woman.

However, I can't see her telling the family that she's transgendered within a week of her husband's death.

Seems to me that the only way the husband's family would know this about her is if he told them before his death.
She had SRS, I believe, two months after they were married. She claims she was honest from the get go, before they were married.

But I am going to say this: That's not the point, in my opinion. Any cis-gendered woman, not legally divorced, would be entitled.

And her assets have been frozen. She is living off of donations.

~~~~~~

And as for Littleton--and no offense, but unless you live here and you are personally battling Littleton, then I don't think you can say it's not entirely indisputable. Dylan went to court to get an "M" on his license, and the judge denied it because of Littleton. Believe me, it's kinda the bible here as far as Texas courts go.

No offense, Sue. It's just one thing to argue that, but it's another thing entirely when it impacts one directly.

And honestly? Back to the family, I am going to default to her story regardless what the family says. She deserves that from me, in my opinion.

Last edited by firie; 07-23-2010 at 08:05 PM. Reason: typing too fast so typos and afterthoughts
firie is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to firie For This Useful Post: