12-15-2009, 04:59 PM
			
			
		 | 
		
			 
			#6
			
		 | 
	
	| 
			
			 Senior Member 
			
			
 How Do You Identify?:  The original lime-twisted femme 
Preferred Pronoun?:  I answer to most things, especially lesbian. 
Relationship Status:  Still loving my Mare ;) 
			
				
			
			
				 
 
				Join Date: Nov 2009 
				Location: New Jersey 
				
				
					Posts: 4,683
				 
				 
	Thanks: 1,343 
	
		
			
				Thanked 11,419 Times in 2,976 Posts
			
		
	 
				
				Rep Power:  21474855 
				
				     
			 
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			
				 
				
			 
			 
			
		
		
		
			
			
	Quote: 
	
	
		
			
				
					Originally Posted by  Bob
					 
				 
				With all respect, whether YOU'VE seen them is merely anecdotal and, frankly, irrelevant to the question of whether violence against men is being depicted in advertising.  It's rather the same argument that many people use to say sexism doesn't exist at all, simply because they've never seen it (somehow); I've heard women say they've never experienced it. 
 
As for quantifying the number of ads that show women in misogynistic, violent poses versus that of men, your point is taken, of course.  It doesn't excuse those that depict men in similar positions, nor does it make those ads less offensive and demeaning to all people. 
			
		 | 
	 
	 
 My point was that it is not as "mainstream" as violence against women.  Of course I KNOW that violence against men exists - but it is not as "acceptable" or as "common" as that of the depiction of women.  When I turn on my TV, I don't see some guys junk hanging out in a car ad - I'll see boobs.  Lots of boobs.  Boobs and ass.  Boobs, ass and ... well you get the drift.
		  
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
		
	 | 
	
		 
		
		
		
		
		 
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 |