View Single Post
Old 01-31-2011, 03:23 PM   #1135
MissItalianDiva
Senior Member

How Do You Identify?:
Miss Twiggy
Preferred Pronoun?:
Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious and that shit doesn't sound atrocious!
Relationship Status:
divorce happens..all that glitters ain't gold
 
MissItalianDiva's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: SLC Utah
Posts: 2,284
Thanks: 2,768
Thanked 7,159 Times in 1,793 Posts
Rep Power: 21474854
MissItalianDiva Has the BEST ReputationMissItalianDiva Has the BEST ReputationMissItalianDiva Has the BEST ReputationMissItalianDiva Has the BEST ReputationMissItalianDiva Has the BEST ReputationMissItalianDiva Has the BEST ReputationMissItalianDiva Has the BEST ReputationMissItalianDiva Has the BEST ReputationMissItalianDiva Has the BEST ReputationMissItalianDiva Has the BEST ReputationMissItalianDiva Has the BEST Reputation
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Corkey View Post
If point one were true the government couldn't require auto insurance, so that doesn't fly.
Point 2 I am on medicare, and I am required to purchase separate coverage that medicare doesn't cover. So point 2 is mute.

It is legal for the government to require health care coverage, because president has been set.

Actually neither is mute and here is why

We are not REQUIRED to purchase auto insurance....you are only required if you are operating a motor vehicle...therefore that has no stance where this law is concerned because you STILL have a CHOICE.

As for medicare and being required to purchase additional coverage once again you have a CHOICE you are not required to be on Medicare therefore you are not required to purchase the supplement.

Neither one establishes precedence in the court of law due to CHOICE
MissItalianDiva is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to MissItalianDiva For This Useful Post: