07-01-2011, 11:13 AM
|
#38
|
Member
How Do You Identify?: Female/Lesbian/half the athlete I used to be
Preferred Pronoun?: she/her
Relationship Status: Dates
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: So proud to be a Pittsburgher
Posts: 1,484
Thanks: 2,645
Thanked 3,730 Times in 1,166 Posts
Rep Power: 21474853
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrea
Linus (and anyone else that cares to jump in):
I agree with what you are saying about if TSA is assigned the job, they should be able to do the job. This situation indicates failure by several parties.
All that aside, do you feel it is important or helpful to show ID at the TSA security points? What is the purpose for doing so? It is the airlines that are tasked with comparing your name to the no-fly list, and you are not actually 'required' to show ID to the TSA if you don't have one (although I don't know how one would prove you don't have something).
Thank you for your input.
Andrea
|
Hi Andrea. You have done a very good job pointing out several key issues about travel and security. I've enjoyed reading your posts. Everyones for that matter.
It is *MY* opinion, that TSA is a very expensive SHILL, and not much more. As has been suggested several times, they are weak.
Airlines and airports do have *REAL* security. Trust me. However, it is not talked about. It can't be. Terrorists are too smart. Then there is always the copycat and the wanna be, which quite frankily, that is what TSA is there to DETER.
They have to look like they are doing something. I didn't read your link yet, but will. I'm trying to get my ass out the door. I just wanted to stress the point. The real security is in place, and it's not discussed for obvious reasons.
__________________
As long as there was coffee in the world, how bad could things be??
|
|
|