Quote:
Originally Posted by AtLastHome
It could have been an accidental death, but not as her lawyer proposed with her father as part of a cover-up. I think that if this were true, it would have come out in the investigation.
|
I agree. I can't see a retired police officer doing anything to cover up a truly accidental death. That doesn't make any kind of sense.
Even if Casey was negligent and it resulted in a truly accidental death, her father (as a retired cop) would know that people aren't generally held responsible for that...and I believe he would have reported it.
Yes, I think the whole family is an amazingly sad dysfunctional unit...with Casey a pathological liar, and her family enabling it for years...and, apparently, doing some lying of their own as well.
The critical piece for me, if I was sitting on that jury, is her actions in the 31 days when her child was "missing." For me, that spells guilt. Maybe I'm close-minded or whatever....but I once lost track of my son when he was 2-1/2, in the Borders bookstore at the mall (he liked to play hide and seek and I didn't realize he was "playing" with me at that moment)...and I was a screaming banshee of a wreck within about 2 minutes flat.
More importantly, when my son finally popped up and said "boo mommy" and laughed....and I started breathing normally again...I apologized to everyone I had alarmed in the immediate area of the store. And every single one of them reacted with something along the lines of "oh no, I would be freaked out too, you're fine."
Everyone understands a mom whose child is missing and who is freaked out, screaming for help, calling the cops, losing her mind.
How does a parent not report a missing 2 or 3 year old for over a month?
And how does that parent go party, dance, drink and get a tattoo that reads "Bella Vita" while they believe their toddler is missing?
I know that the defense tried to paint that as her dysfunctional form of grief....but I just don't buy it.