Quote:
Originally Posted by Martina
What's individualistic about it? i am sure there are explanations that focus on individuals, but what is individualistic about it. i don't actually know what gender theory you mean, so it's hard for me to speculate.
|
Postmodernism is a mix of philosophies: Primarily, subjectivism and epistemic relativism. These philosophies hold that no epistemic standard is defensible, true or factual.
A postmodernist might argue “that modern science is nothing more than a “myth,” a “narration”, a “social construction.”
(Professor Steven Luper, Trinity University)
Gender theory is the offspring of postmodernism. One of its primary tenets is that gender performativity is a way of destabilizing/deconstructing gender conventions.
Feminists hold that gender conventions are fictional, grotesque myths; and that re-enacting them in any context perpetuates oppression.
Gender performativity is an i
ndividual, self-focused activity – even when performed in a group…. Models at a Playboy photo shoot are
individually re-inscribing gender constructs even when posing for a group photograph.
The enactment of real-world, gender conventions - of performing/embodying fictional constructs – makes them appear (feel) natural, organic, real. This reinforces gender stereotypes whether the performativity is meant to be parody or not; whether it’s meant to be a burlesque metaphor or not.
African Feminist and author, Nnameka, had this to say about sex roles:
Western European and North American epistemologies since ‘post structuralism’s [now referred to as postmodernism] focus on discourse and aesthetics instead of social action encourages the egocentricity and individualism that undermines collective action.’ (Nnameka, 2003, p.364).