Thank you so much, Miss Tick and SmoothButch, for posting these artifacts (documents).
I would love to attend in Philadelphia next summer!
Hopefully I won't have to hitchhike my way to the event.
I think the instrument presented is ambitious also; but I think that with what time constraints and deadlines the members of the WGF were against, I think they did fairly well in putting this instrument together.
At the moment, I can see that maybe
no. 7 might need the language tightened a bit or at least review other prior case law tested in the Supreme Court pertaining to how current law is (or has been) applied in the past. The reason I say this is because, do we have access to environmental law with rules and regulations that are useful or are the current rules and regs lacking specificity?
I have a current
2011 edition of
Communication Law and I could check to see if there are examples of prior case law tested in the Environmental arena and see if, for myself or anyone else, if what we have existing on the books equals or comes near enough to the language drawn in no. 7.
That's the only flag that comes to my attention at this time in examining the current instrument that has been drawn by the WFG.
Thanks again, Miss Tick and SmoothButch!