Member
How Do You Identify?: gay. I'm very happy, thank you!
Preferred Pronoun?: Miss
Relationship Status: Chefhmboyrd's seeing eye blonde
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Nashvegas
Posts: 253
Thanks: 412
Thanked 1,109 Times in 229 Posts
Rep Power: 6596929
|
interesting
Good thread, very interesting! This is a big topic between many same-sex couples, and I have seen this make or break relationships.
I am pleased to see the couples, who have decided to have a baby together, but are no longer a couple, are able to keep both the child's and non-biological parent's relationship intact.
The cases The_Lady_Snow referenced are in your favor if you both marry in Massachusetts and have your child there. If you are familiar with laws, you know the courts have to rule the same way in any future similar cases. Fortunately Massachusetts has their sh*t together. If I may say so without intent to offend anyone; they separate church and state, and recognize marriage as a legal contract, not a union made before god.
It leaves me asking: Would this be something noted on a prenump agreement?
|