Quote:
Originally Posted by Jess
Sorry to disagree with your logic, although I can see it. I don't see where making becoming addicted easier will make getting treatment any better. They don't give federal money now for addicts. Why would that change? There was a short period in the 80's where "treatment" was the trendy thing to do and insurance companies actually paid for it. Those days are way over and it is now "optional". Imagine that. It's optional to get treatment, as it is optional to become an addict. So says Blue Cross.
I try to see the point in legalizing highly addictive chemicals, but sorry, I just don't.
|
It's okay. We can totally agree to disagree. I don't think decriminalization will make becoming an addict any easier.
When I walk down the alcohol aisle in my supermarket? I always people watch who is buying booze. Because anyone buying it
could be an alcoholic, but not
everyone buying it
is an alcoholic. They're walking by the same racks of booze after all.
I was almost killed by a drunk driver, but because it was a hit & run case when we got to court he was sentence to the maximum allowed for hit & run. Four years. I pleaded with the court to send him to a rehabilitation facility or to at least order AA when he paroled. The law didn't allow for that. I don't think prison time is going to help this young man at ALL but rather send out an angrier more volatile person. Who most likely will drink and drive again. How is that justice for either one of us or for potential victims?
As for the Blue Cross? Often times when you have cancer they deem chemo "not medically necessary" so yeah. They are the devil because they are allowed to be.