Quote:
Originally Posted by Allison W
Was the composition of the court different when they ruled against us? Because I know Sotomayor and Kagan were added only within the past few years.
I suppose what's really important is how Kennedy swings on gay rights issues, because that swing vote plus the liberal bloc would get the majority.
...Yep, after poking around on Google, looks like Kennedy will give us the 5-4 majority. Apparently his mentor was gay and he's actually taken it upon himself to write majority opinions supporting pro-gay rulings.
So barring some completely unforeseen upset like a member of the liberal bloc being secretly
replaced with a goateed evil twin, marriage equality should be
the law of the land once the Supreme Court hears the case. |
Excellent point!
The make-up of the SCOTUS was different, and it was a different time when that decision was made.
Unfortunately, the Religious right will step up their efforts to derail equality (as currently seen in Indiana and etc...) and i fear the SCOTUS willl have to once again step in to guarantee our civil rights. Of course, we see what good that has done POC in this country. If they want to discriminate, they will find a way!