07-30-2011, 04:34 PM
|
#91
|
Senior Member
How Do You Identify?: malapropist
Preferred Pronoun?: she
Relationship Status: single
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: New England
Posts: 2,169
Thanks: 6,367
Thanked 4,024 Times in 1,209 Posts
Rep Power: 21474853
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CherryFemme
First and foremost, I would like to apologize to the member who pointed out that I “de-railed” this thread. I did not mean to upset or disrespect you or anyone else. I know I already apologized to you personally, but as you mentioned, the “thread starter” did not begin this thread to debate democracy. I am apologizing to you both. Consider my hand slapped.
Before I leave, I want to thank the people who joined me down the garden path to “de-railment”. Your insights and comments were fantastic. I took a law class last semester and I miss deconstructing the US Constitution and discussing the religious affiliations of its creators. It was a great class.
My intent was not to de-rail a thread but rather to establish a baseline (God is not in the Constitution) and see how Reception theory applies or does not apply. I did not think anyone would take my bait, and you can imagine how sad I am that I am not able to play the devil’s advocate and hash out this idea… This might seem random but the core of my question was really:
What happens in the gap between policy and implementation when the policy is the US Constitution?
BUT, I am sure that by even writing that sentence, I am offending someone, somewhere. I really do not do well in the threads since this is the second time I have been told that I have distressed someone by de-railing a thread unintentionally. Again, sorry for the de-railment.
I give up.
~CF
|
Some of the most interesting discussions come out of derailed threads.
Don't let a little hand-slap get you down.
|
|
|