That use of 'my truth' is, more or less, unproblematic since it really does not effect the world the rest of us live in. If that were the *only* way that people use that phrase, I wouldn't be concerned (and probably wouldn't be involved in this conversation). My concern is that people don't draw a distinction (presumably because they do not see one) between the following kinds of statements:
1) If there is not some kind of intellectual meeting-of-the-minds I am not going to be happy in a relationship.
2) If we allow marriages between two men or two women, we will have to allow marriages between father and daughter or a 50 year old man and an 10 year old girl etc.
The problem isn't statements of type-1, the problem is statements of type-2. I think we should not evaluate the 'my truth' idea on the basis of type-1 statements but on the basis of type-2 statements.
Cheers
Aj
Quote:
Originally Posted by JustJo
I probably shouldn't enter into serious discussions since I'm in a crappy ass negative mood (disclaimer), but....for me there's a significant difference between saying "the truth" and saying "my truth."
When I use this phrase (and I do), it's something that I have learned about myself, and that I know to be true for me and me alone.
My truths don't apply to anyone else. They only apply to me.
For instance, one of my truths is that I cannot be in a committed relationship without passion and sexual intimacy. I can't. I end up feeling rejected, depressed, "less than" and disconnected. If it goes on long enough, I start feeling (first) depressed, (secondly) angry, and (finally) a combination of "my life is dead and empty and not worth living" and "I hate you for treating me like this, get the fuck out of my life."
Does this mean that the truth is that committed relationships must include passion and sexual intimacy?
Nope.
I'm sure there are some or many or *fill in the blank because I haven't a clue* wonderful, committed, loving relationships that don't.
|