Senior Member
How Do You Identify?: bigender
Preferred Pronoun?: whatevs
Relationship Status: in a relationship
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Tx
Posts: 3,535
Thanks: 11,042
Thanked 13,993 Times in 2,594 Posts
Rep Power: 21474854
|
I think people are totally within their rights to have whatever wedding suits the couple in question. And overtaxed moms the world over have a right to feel a bit butt-hurt to get an invitation in the mail from people who ostensibly know they won't be able to attend if the child can't come.
I have a vague recollection that childcare was offered at my long-ago wedding. It was at a church, and there was the option of paying for one of the church daycare workers to come in and baby-sit for a few hours. That might be an option to consider if a close friend or relative is stuck with sole responsibility for a kid and without the means to get a babysitter.
Anyway, I think both parties have a right to their feelings, but the main thing that could soothe ruffled feathers is an actual real conversation. And if neither party feels like talking, then maybe this is not a guest the happy couple actually wants at their wedding. Because people can and do move mountains to accommodate each other if it's worth it to them.
I like kids at weddings. But that's me.
__________________
I'm a fountain of blood. In the shape of a girl.
- Bjork
What is to give light must endure burning.
-Viktor Frankl
|