Butch Femme Planet - View Single Post - myers-briggs and your occupation

dreadgeek · 01-05-2010, 04:14 PM

This will, of course, come as a great surprise to everyone here:

INTP (Architect)

Greatest precision in thought and language. Can readily discern contradictions and inconsistencies. They are good at logic and math and make good philosophers and theoretical scientists, but not writers or salespeople. 1% of the total population.

It's true, I would be a HORRIBLE salesperson.

strategic planning---->perhaps
writer---->If only I weren't addicted to eating. (Also I can't help noticing that at one point they say 'not writers' and then list writers.)
staff development--->Not really
lawyer--->Seriously considered it
architect--->Nope
software designer--->Could see that
financial analyst---->Don't care enough about money to be good at it.
college professor--->Yes, could see taking up the 'family business'
photographer--->Perhaps
logician---->See comment re: writing
artist---->Not really me
systems analyst---->Sure, why not
neurologist---->yeah baby!
physicist---->Thought about it but decided against it
psychologist--->See above
research/development...specialist--->Grant writing...hmmm
computer programmer--->See software designer
data base manager--->Perhaps
chemist--->Thought about this as well
biologist--->Yes, as a matter of fact take the DBM, SysAnalyst, and CompProg jobs, add them to biologist and mix well and that would be my program of study.

investigator--->I could write about investigators, does that count?

Cheers
Aj

01-05-2010, 04:14 PM	#21
dreadgeek Power Femme How Do You Identify?: Cinnamon spiced, caramel colored, power-femme Preferred Pronoun?: She Relationship Status: Married to a wonderful horse girl Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Lat: 45.60 Lon: -122.60 Posts: 1,733 My Photo Gallery Thanks: 1,132 Thanked 6,848 Times in 1,493 Posts Rep Power: 21474851	This will, of course, come as a great surprise to everyone here: INTP (Architect) Greatest precision in thought and language. Can readily discern contradictions and inconsistencies. They are good at logic and math and make good philosophers and theoretical scientists, but not writers or salespeople. 1% of the total population. It's true, I would be a HORRIBLE salesperson. strategic planning---->perhaps writer---->If only I weren't addicted to eating. (Also I can't help noticing that at one point they say 'not writers' and then list writers.) staff development--->Not really lawyer--->Seriously considered it architect--->Nope software designer--->Could see that financial analyst---->Don't care enough about money to be good at it. college professor--->Yes, could see taking up the 'family business' photographer--->Perhaps logician---->See comment re: writing artist---->Not really me systems analyst---->Sure, why not neurologist---->yeah baby! physicist---->Thought about it but decided against it psychologist--->See above research/development...specialist--->Grant writing...hmmm computer programmer--->See software designer data base manager--->Perhaps chemist--->Thought about this as well biologist--->Yes, as a matter of fact take the DBM, SysAnalyst, and CompProg jobs, add them to biologist and mix well and that would be my program of study. investigator--->I could write about investigators, does that count? Cheers Aj __________________ Proud member of the reality-based community. "People on the side of The People always ended up disappointed, in any case. They found that The People tended not to be grateful or appreciative or forward-thinking or obedient. The People tended to be small-minded and conservative and not very clever and were even distrustful of cleverness. And so, the children of the revolution were faced with the age-old problem: it wasn’t that you had the wrong kind of government, which was obvious, but that you had the wrong kind of people. As soon as you saw people as things to be measured, they didn’t measure up." (Terry Pratchett)