Quote:
Originally Posted by homoe
John R. Bolton, the former national security adviser, says in his new book that the House in its impeachment inquiry should have investigated President Trump not just for pressuring Ukraine to incriminate his domestic foes but for a variety of instances when he sought to intervene in law enforcement matters for political reasons.
It's too bad that Bolton picked being a profiteer over a patriot!
Perhaps had the House had that information, at the time of the impeachment hearing, the bum would of been removed from office by now!
|
If John Bolton was expecting his book tour to go smoothly, he was sadly mistaken.
Fox News host Martha McCallum asked Bolton, “Isn’t it a shirking of duty to not step up in that moment, given how strongly you felt about what was going on?”
Her colleague, Brett Baier, pressed Bolton, “Don’t you feel some responsibility now that you’re saying [Trump] should have been impeached on other things, but you never piped up?”
Joy Behar of “The View” noted that Bolton worked for Trump for 17 months, but “never said a word until someone gave you $2 million to write a book about it.”
“View” co-host Sunny Hostin asked, “Help me understand why your silence is not complicity?”
CNN anchor Wolf Blitzer chided Bolton by saying, “You chose not to [testify to Congress under oath]. Instead, you wanted to wait until you could get your, quote, $2 million advance for your book.”