![]() |
|
View Poll Results: Does Libya need our help? | |||
Favor |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
17 | 24.64% |
Oppose |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
35 | 50.72% |
Unsure |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
17 | 24.64% |
Voters: 69. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#10 |
Senior Member
How Do You Identify?:
. Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: .
Posts: 2,905
Thanks: 4,151
Thanked 5,824 Times in 1,721 Posts
Rep Power: 21474854 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
"Between war and passivity there are a thousand possibilities." - Howard Zinn
Which is to say, a military/armed response is not the only way to support democratic process. We could offer constructive aid that will provide support to those people already fighting for democracy within Libya, or for women's rights in Libya, Afghanistan, etc. I can't profess to know what that looks like, but I do know it seems unlikely as American foreign policy is not motivated by humanitarian issues, but by economic interests. We support regimes that cooperate with us and give us access to their oil (and other economic benefits). The idea of sending in "sharpshooters," our own military (or private sector) assassins, is arrogant. Because we're the United States of America, we have the right to dispatch leaders who we find unpalatable? And yet, we are stunned when our nation is attacked.
__________________
Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin to slit throats. - H. L. Mencken |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to Mister Bent For This Useful Post: |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|