|
View Poll Results: Do Business Owners Have the Right to Refuse Service Due to Moral/Religious Objections? | |||
No | 15 | 25.00% | |
Yes | 38 | 63.33% | |
Unsure/Maybe/Other | 7 | 11.67% | |
Voters: 60. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
03-17-2011, 09:14 PM | #20 | |
Member
How Do You Identify?:
- Preferred Pronoun?:
- Relationship Status:
- Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: -
Posts: 533
Thanks: 1,135
Thanked 801 Times in 314 Posts
Rep Power: 4143697 |
Quote:
Walgreen's, where this took place, is a private business. The pharmacist refused the woman's business on moral grounds. That seems to be consistent with the position of several posters, at least as it relates to the florist. I just want to know if those folks siding with the florist sided with the pharmacist, too... and if one is okay and one isn't, why? Where is the boundary, who sets it? Is it the use of the flowers necessarily the florist's business (gay wedding vs. straight wedding)? Again, I'm not trying to kick up trouble, I'm genuinely curious as to the difference, and what people think about one vs. the other... and how, if we decide it's okay to do that in one case, we justify it not being okay in the other. Also, who decides? Have we collectively already decided, on many levels, that some forms of discrimination are not socially acceptable by putting policies in place? Last edited by rainintothesea; 03-17-2011 at 09:15 PM. Reason: Added gay vs. straight wedding example. |
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to rainintothesea For This Useful Post: |
|
|