![]() |
|
View Poll Results: Is Nuclear Energy Worth the Risk? | |||
Yes ~ I'll explain |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
8 | 17.39% |
No ~ I'll Explain |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
26 | 56.52% |
Not sure ~ Enlighten me |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
10 | 21.74% |
I'm skeered of anything Radioactive ~ but I might join in anyway |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
2 | 4.35% |
Voters: 46. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#19 |
Senior Member
How Do You Identify?:
pervert butch feminist woman Preferred Pronoun?:
see above Relationship Status:
independent entity Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Oakland
Posts: 1,826
Thanks: 4,068
Thanked 7,652 Times in 1,522 Posts
Rep Power: 21474853 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
What happened to 'American ingenuity'? Nuclear power is the best we can come up with to frigging boil water, creating steam to run a turbine to produce electricity??????
We need a paradigm shift in how we think about energy production and distribution. Right now we operate on the idea that everyone should be hooked up to the local power plant grid and ALL the electricity for an area must be produced and distributed by the local power company. That power company is most likely a for profit corporation and they are sucking up your dollars (your energy bill) in order to make a profit. All utilities should be publicly owned and not for profit. If every new building built had solar or wind panels on it, the amount of power needed from the grid could be reduced, significantly in many cases. A home building company here in CA has decided to put solar panels on all their new homes. How about all the acres of parking lots with cars baking in the sun? In SF, there is a parking lot with solar panels over the parking spaces..........energy created and stored, cars in the shade and asphalt not putting off 120 degree heat. We need a bit more of the 'can do' spirit instead of the 'nope, too expensive' lie. |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|