Is Starbucks blaming the victim?

[SuperFemme]

Originally Posted by Linus

It is a real story. Horton is still a common family name and they may or may not be aware of the famous franchise to the north (given it's in California).

I do think that the corporation should have taken a way different stance on this given that she is stating that she was NOT interested or involved with supervisor. Their message is suggesting, IMO, that even if you were forced to participate (at fear of losing job, friends, etc.) then you were "agreeing". And that, plain and simple, is wrong. I hope they get their asses served on a platter.

That is what my line of thinking is too Linus.

If you watch the video where they ask if she had sex BEFORE working there. With Anyone. It is an intentional attempt to smear her name/character. I was waiting for them to accuse her of wearing that green apron in a suggestive manner....

Good Lord!