01-25-2012, 07:13 AM | #21 |
Member
How Do You Identify?:
Sarcastically Preferred Pronoun?:
She Relationship Status:
Unavailable Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Home of the Yankee's
Posts: 752
Thanks: 1,708
Thanked 2,645 Times in 590 Posts
Rep Power: 12725118 |
Agreed!
Facebook simply doesn't work at any level for dating. I'm not even so sure it's great for relationships. There are lots of reasons I don't like it. The picture you get of someone, that's real of course, (I have plenty of gaming friends on there who have accounts for their dog or cat) can be exciting or you can start to see things. You see thier world, but you can't interpret it. There isn't enough of the right information that dating gives you. I would also say that with someone that you're dating, that it's way too much accessibility to your life. (imo) At least from a romantic standpoint. Not old fashioned dating for sure. Dating, or relational development, is difficult with so many means of communication. The idea that you should have access like that is a newer one, I think. Romance in found the mysterious and in surprise. In longing. Not in knowing they just bought a blender.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to adorable For This Useful Post: |
01-25-2012, 07:28 AM | #22 | |
Member
How Do You Identify?:
Femme/Gentlewoman Preferred Pronoun?:
She/her Relationship Status:
Happily married 05/17/14 Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Saskatchewan, Canada
Posts: 561
Thanks: 2,056
Thanked 2,157 Times in 403 Posts
Rep Power: 21474849 |
Quote:
I wish I could explain what I was actually feeling... when I asked hym to be fair and tell her that hy was seeing other people, it was because hy was complaining to me about her clinginess but also hadn't told her about me or anyone else. So, because I was unimpressed by this disingenuity, I asked hym to at least talk to her and clarify that hy was seeing other people. I was rather upset - I even excused myself very nicely and went home to think. I started the thread mainly because I wanted to know if this Facebook passive-aggression was common. It's never happened to me because I've been in relationships while Facebook was gaining popularity, and I'm just stymied by how much importance people lend it in everyday life. |
|
01-25-2012, 07:50 AM | #23 |
Practically Lives Here
How Do You Identify?:
Femme Preferred Pronoun?:
dee Relationship Status:
Hitched up Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Livin’ the Dream
Posts: 24,079
Thanks: 30,560
Thanked 54,957 Times in 13,922 Posts
Rep Power: 21474873 |
modern day Dear Jane/John letters...
People either have it in their character to be respectful or they don't. |
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to girl_dee For This Useful Post: |
01-25-2012, 08:36 AM | #24 | |
Member
How Do You Identify?:
Sarcastically Preferred Pronoun?:
She Relationship Status:
Unavailable Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Home of the Yankee's
Posts: 752
Thanks: 1,708
Thanked 2,645 Times in 590 Posts
Rep Power: 12725118 |
Quote:
Oh, I think most of us have been there with not being able to explain what we are feeling. I think what I have tried to embrace is exactly that. Fighting it seems, well, pointless. It really is ok if I can't explain it. More will be revealed. Always. I can be guilty of outsmarting myself sometimes. This is why facebook is not so great when you are into someone. The risk is in revealing too much or wanting to know more. Passive-aggressiveness when it comes to dating is common because it's very much a cat and mouse game. Outright aggression is frowned upon, that is why we refer to it as "the dance." Yet, unless we are aggressive somehow, or have some sort of strategy, we will never get what we really want. The trick is in knowing when to risk and what. Being good at poker, or chess, (or a war historian) comes in handy. Having conversations like the one you described is more like baiting, or hym trying to force your hand. Kind of a high school tactic on hys part, but everyone isn't working at the same skill level. lol. Last edited by adorable; 01-25-2012 at 08:40 AM. Reason: pronouns ugh |
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to adorable For This Useful Post: |
01-25-2012, 09:30 AM | #25 | ||
Infamous Member
How Do You Identify?:
pushy broad Preferred Pronoun?:
she Relationship Status:
Follow your heart; it knows things your mind cannot explain. Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Southeast corner
Posts: 5,633
Thanks: 24,417
Thanked 25,407 Times in 4,661 Posts
Rep Power: 21474856 |
Quote:
Quote:
If I feel like you (general you) don't understand me, or I don't understand you, or we can't talk....no amount of physical connection or attraction is going to override that. The times when I have let the physical connection override my brain have ultimately ended badly...because a vital connection is missing. So yes.....it's possible to be emotionally engaged, and fall in love, without having seen that person in the flesh. Then, the physical meeting and connection is a confirmation (or not) of where my brain already is. Having a complete relationship with no physical contact at all? No, not for me. I would not be satisfied with a purely virtual relationship. For me, a relationship needs all three....mind, body, and spirit/emotion. Now....on the subject of manners....pffftttt.....I deleted my Facebook page entirely. I found it to be a source of unneeded drama in my life.
__________________
I'm not tall enough to ride emotional roller coasters
|
||
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to JustJo For This Useful Post: |
01-25-2012, 06:03 PM | #26 | |
Member
How Do You Identify?:
stone femme Preferred Pronoun?:
she Relationship Status:
always solo Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 368
Thanks: 380
Thanked 815 Times in 198 Posts
Rep Power: 4309956 |
Quote:
Yes, the brain engages first for me. Intelligence, genuine interest in me (and vice versa), and some spark of attraction has to be there. But even the best romances on paper or cyber space can't hold up to that first physical meeting. And even then, you have to do the dance. You have to ask questions, listen, and reply honestly. |
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to SweetJane For This Useful Post: |
|
|