|
09-14-2010, 05:44 PM | #1 |
Member
How Do You Identify?:
Momma, Ma'am Preferred Pronoun?:
She/Her Relationship Status:
I am in love. Truly Madly Deeply Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: California
Posts: 997
Thanks: 502
Thanked 2,128 Times in 560 Posts
Rep Power: 2369287 |
I think it is about sex. That is why it is called bi-sexual. I have never had sex with a (omg what word do I use? breaths through a moment of language horror). But what do I know is that I have only been an out dyke for 35 years and it always meant the same.
__________________
"I have a respect for manners as such, they are a way of dealing with people you don't agree with or like." Margaret Mead Read me! www.leatherati.com |
09-14-2010, 06:45 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
How Do You Identify?:
Satan in a Sunday Hat Preferred Pronoun?:
Maow Relationship Status:
Married Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: The Chemical Valley
Posts: 4,086
Thanks: 3,312
Thanked 8,742 Times in 2,566 Posts
Rep Power: 21474855 |
I self-ID as Queer. However, I -am- technically bisexual and will use that word when it's necessary to make my point or when I'm talking to someone who the word "Queer" is just too confusing for. I am legally married to a female (sex = female, gender = Butch) but things could have easily turned out differently for me. I am glad that things ended up how they ended up - because I think if I had ended up with a man that I would have lost my community...but I will never deny that the possibility of a legally binding monogamous relationship with a man was never off of the table for me.
For myself, the sex of the other person just does not figure in when I am evaluating if I am attracted to him/her. It's completely irrelevant. Gender / gender presentation -does- factor in for me, however. I am attracted to masculine people. Butches and Men (both trans and non-trans) do it for me. (The only exceptions to that rule are Drew Barrymore and Rosario Dawson). It's important to me that potential dates are clever, well-read, have irreverent senses of humour, like sarcasm, are politically compatible with me, have similar tastes in music, and interact with me the way I like being interacted with.
__________________
bête noire \bet-NWAHR\, noun: One that is particularly disliked or that is to be avoided.
|
09-14-2010, 08:08 PM | #3 |
Member
How Do You Identify?:
Girlie with a touch of bossy Preferred Pronoun?:
She, but not hung up on the details Relationship Status:
Parenting our furry family with SmoothButch Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 385
Thanks: 772
Thanked 963 Times in 257 Posts
Rep Power: 4366970 |
I am so inspired by all of the posts, all of the honesty.
I think bisexuality is the ugly stepchild of the gay community sometimes. One of my nearest and dearest identifies as queer even though she's fully bisexual, simply because she's afraid of the stigma that both straight and gay communities associate with the term - either she can't make up her mind, she's too afraid of being fully gay, she's only half-gay because of politics, she's a whore, she's a traitor...there's a long list of inadequacies that get thrown at people who identify as bisexual. My understanding of bisexuality is that it's just as fluid and dynamic as any other sexuality or gender. Some people identify as lesbian because it's about the sex - women just turn them on in a way that other genders never could. For others, lesbian is more about the emotional and spiritual connection than the sex. I think the same is true for bisexuals - some people are equally attracted to both sexes but gravitate towards one or the other because of emotional or spiritual connections. Others are split right down the middle. I wish more people who were truly bisexual would come flying out of the closet to help dispel so many of the assumptions and myths. Personally, I am attracted to pretty much any kind of person (XX, XY, male, female, man, woman, gender-fluid, gender-variant, gender-queer, butch, femme, hym, hir) as long as the energy and the attitude and the charisma are there. I am equal opportunity that way when it comes to what turns me on and makes me horny (though I will say sperm kind of grosses me out no matter how hot the guy is - LOL). The deciding factor for me is that I'm just naturally drawn to women and folks with women-bodied experiences. I feel more comfortable and open. I feel a connection that blossoms organically when the person I'm interacting with intrinsically understands a little bit of my story. I don't identify as bisexual because while the sexual attraction may exist, the emotional and spiritual connection reaches it's true depths with women, butches, and FTMs more than the XYs of the world. If I weren't in a relationship, I wouldn't exclude any possibility, though - I believe circumstances are constantly changing my perception of the world. Matters of the heart can be messy and complicated and I try not to be too rigid in my definitions. A personal note to betenoire - your post was fantastic. Your last point about the importance of finding a match for your personality, your passions, your style is spot-on. I love it. |
The Following 18 Users Say Thank You to Laerkin For This Useful Post: |
09-20-2010, 08:24 AM | #4 | |
Member
How Do You Identify?:
Queersexual Female Preferred Pronoun?:
She Relationship Status:
smiling real big Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: My Own House Illinois
Posts: 330
Thanks: 871
Thanked 346 Times in 151 Posts
Rep Power: 645437 |
Quote:
__________________
Stay Gold. |
|
09-26-2011, 11:42 AM | #5 | |
Power Femme
How Do You Identify?:
Cinnamon spiced, caramel colored, power-femme Preferred Pronoun?:
She Relationship Status:
Married to a wonderful horse girl Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Lat: 45.60 Lon: -122.60
Posts: 1,733
Thanks: 1,132
Thanked 6,848 Times in 1,493 Posts
Rep Power: 21474851 |
Quote:
cheers Aj
__________________
Proud member of the reality-based community. "People on the side of The People always ended up disappointed, in any case. They found that The People tended not to be grateful or appreciative or forward-thinking or obedient. The People tended to be small-minded and conservative and not very clever and were even distrustful of cleverness. And so, the children of the revolution were faced with the age-old problem: it wasn’t that you had the wrong kind of government, which was obvious, but that you had the wrong kind of people. As soon as you saw people as things to be measured, they didn’t measure up." (Terry Pratchett) |
|
|
|