|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
07-20-2013, 08:48 AM | #9 |
Member
How Do You Identify?:
Just Me Preferred Pronoun?:
she/her Relationship Status:
Busy Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Phoenix - Valley of the Sun
Posts: 1,429
Thanks: 1,010
Thanked 2,920 Times in 879 Posts
Rep Power: 21474852 |
My sentiments run along the lines of what blush had to say about it. I think anyone concerned about protecting their assets from the person they are about to marry should rethink marriage. This isn't coming from a "marriage is love, love should be romantic" place, because I'm much more practical than that. Marriage in this country is a legal contract, essentially, and yes, legal contracts often involve assets. But to put protections in place up front -- to me that just says "I don't trust this person."
Edited to add: If protecting assets is a major concern, maybe the "benefits" of marriage don't outweigh the potential pitfalls. Another thought: Someone mentioned that a prenup would force a frank discussion about finances. Living together doesn't automatically equate to the sharing of assets, pooling of funds, etc. These types of discussions should be had *anyway* -*before* deciding to live together and especially before considering getting married to each other. If you need a prenup to force a discussion, then it seems strange to me that marriage would even be a consideration.
__________________
Stephanie "There is only one success - to be able to spend your life in your own way." Christopher Morley Last edited by QueenofSmirks; 07-20-2013 at 08:57 AM. |
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to QueenofSmirks For This Useful Post: |
|
|