[suebee]

Originally Posted by dreadgeek

Okay, I'll ask you the SAME question that I've asked others: what level of punishment would be enough? Please let us know.

Cheers
Aj

I don't think I've ever broached the subject of his state-sanctioned punishment. I worked in systems parallel to the justice systems long enough to know that the manner in which "punishments" (in "correctional" institutions ) are doled out is pretty much a crock. And I don't doubt that him being a black man entered into his sentence. But I also don't doubt that him being a sports celebrity entered into it either!

I'll say it again: what I'm talking about is how *I* perceive Michael Vick's so-called "change". Does he really "get it"? What I've seen of his statements tells me that he doesn't. Toughy came on last night and said that she has seen things about Vicks' efforts that says otherwise. I sent her a rep saying I'd love to see those statements/efforts; that maybe I'd change my mind if I was more informed.

As I said in my last post: how we see this is a matter of values. I'm certainly not saying that the issue of inequality in the justice system is NOT an important aspect, only that my focus is on the magnitude of his crimes against animals. Sachita already said that she sees his crimes as equal to crimes involving child abuse. I agree. Furthermore, considering the absolutely astounding degree of the abuse AND the number of victims, I would think this issue would concern more than just those who are animal-lovers. His involvement in dog-fighting may stem from cultural elements, but systemic abuse of animals is a BIG red flag for many other pathologies.

Again, I'm not talking about societal sentencing. I have no doubt that many on this site would boycott a convicted child abuser, or sexual offender. I feel the same way about Vick.