I don't want to (and can't) speak for a pretty, but my read of her post was that "T-femme" suggests an identity based solely upon attraction/partnering. I respect where you're coming from, Bit, but doesn't that feel minimizing of femme to you?
Which is to ask, how does T-femme stand alone as an identity?
If there were no such thing as a transman, what would be the identity of a T-femme?
"apretty, is YOUR identity fetish/objectification/dehumanizing of your partner? Does YOUR identity depend one whit upon that of your partner?"
A femme's/woman's identity is exclusive of that of her partner.
Within these parameters, I don't think the same question could be asked of a transman/genderqueer/third gender butch because that is his identity. He's not identifying based on his lover's identity.
I'm not trying to take issue with your position, just wanted to point out how I read the question. For sure it's provocative.
__________________
Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin to slit throats. - H. L. Mencken
|