08-16-2011, 08:20 AM
|
#16
|
Member
How Do You Identify?: Femme
Relationship Status: rainbows!
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 466
Thanks: 303
Thanked 2,522 Times in 409 Posts
Rep Power: 12032610
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chazz
Yes, there were knotty issues; it got ugly sometimes, but.......
There are STILL knotty issues. It still gets ugly.
The beauty of Feminism is that issues are addressed and redressed. Discussion, debate, heuristic inquiry are not vilified as they are, now, within the LGBTQ community under the reign of gender theory.
As a femme, I have had to confront vilification from feminists.
Unlike today, that splintering-off was not cast as divisive, oppressive, phobic.... Think Mich Fest.... How crazy and self-centered to think any of that?
Not sure I understand the reference to Mich Fest. I am also not sure that feminist WOC would agree that there has been no oppressive consequences.
As a femme lesbian, I do not agree with that assessment.
I have always found it suspicious that genderists point to the the "warts" of Feminism rather than its successes. The vilification of Feminism and Feminists is strategic. It's about the "tools".... Feminist "tools" do bring the "master's" house down.
Hmmmm.... I'm feeling pretty uncomfortable with the "this-vs-that" direction this discussion is taking. Does this mean that if I, as a feminist, point to warts, I am somehow enacting a betrayal? That feels possibly divisive and oppressive.....
|
Maybe I'm misunderstanding the tone here, or maybe I'm pushing a point at the wrong juncture... but I am unwilling to wear rose-colored feminist glasses. It's funny, since I have been one of the most ardent feminists on these boards for years to be in this position, but I'm firm in both my feminism and my willingness to critique it.
Heart
|
|
|