Quote:
Originally Posted by Chancie
What bothers me is not the desire to dance a waltz with predetermined steps and roles, if that's the dance you most enjoy.
It's the very weird assumption from a bunch of queers that it reflects the good old days.
Who were they good for, anyway?
I know that there are queers who aspire to the financial freedom to a very particular lifestyle choice but
The good old days?
Yes, some young men were more polite to older women than we might see on public transportation but
You would be safe to assume that a young white man sat with his legs spread way out while older Black women stood.
Surely those of you who wish for a marriage that mirrors The Cleavers can find a more descriptive way of describing it than the tired old chestnut, Oh, how I miss the good old days, or I am an old fashioned man or femme or butch.
ETA PS My post is not a response to Julie's post.
|
LOL!! It would have been ok if it was in response to my post. :-)
Basically, I'm asking the same thing you are. How can we talk about this 'june cleaver' way of living, without going back in history.
I know I call it the good old days, but that's cause I don't know any other concise way to describe what works for me. And normally only with people who are heterosexual. There has GOT to be a way that won't twist everybodys nose outta whack. You know??
julie
__________________
If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough" Albert Einstein
Yes, I'm aware I can't spell, and no, I don't care quite enough to spell check. Sorry!!!
