Sexual Images of Children in the Media: Promoting Pedophilia?

[SuperFemme]

Originally Posted by HowSoonIsNow

I just googled *pedophilia and media images of children* to find any research/evidence on this subject, and this thread is the first result.

And that is why I use Bing vs. Google. It is much more reliable.

I too, Googled "Sexual Images of Children in the Media: Promoting Pedophilia?"

http://www.smh.com.au/business/media...1130-k178.html
(i guess dylan didn't read this)

http://www.hawaii.edu/hivandaids/Ped...e_Internet.pdf
(the internet which carries images of over sexualized children and pedophiles. relevant.)


http://americansfortruth.com/issues/pedophiliapederasty
(dylan approved)

http://www.etherzone.com/2010/mako011110.shtml
(a tidbit about a society where pornography and obscenity flourish and where children are sexualized.)

http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=27431 (this one is all about us gay pedophiles)

http://www.uri.edu/artsci/wms/hughes/ppitv.htm
(this one may be stretching it a bit, but did come up in the first few links of search)


Imagine my surprise when the planet didn't even show up on a search.

Thank you Dylan, for educating me on "relevance". I can die happy now.

[Soon]

Originally Posted by SuperFemme

And that is why I use Bing vs. Google. It is much more reliable.

I too, Googled "Sexual Images of Children in the Media: Promoting Pedophilia?"

http://www.smh.com.au/business/media...1130-k178.html

http://www.hawaii.edu/hivandaids/Ped...e_Internet.pdf

http://americansfortruth.com/issues/pedophiliapederasty

http://www.etherzone.com/2010/mako011110.shtml

http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=27431 (this one is all about us gay pedophiles)

http://www.uri.edu/artsci/wms/hughes/ppitv.htm

Imagine my surprise when the planet didn't even show up on a search.

Interesting! And here I've been loving my Google Chrome! I wonder why the discrepancy in search results (i have no idea about these things.).

[SuperFemme]

Originally Posted by HowSoonIsNow

Interesting! And here I've been loving my Google Chrome! I wonder why the discrepancy in search results (i have no idea about these things.).

Have you not seen the commercials? They are SO true. I googled and sure enough, the planet came first. Crazy.

[Dylan]

Originally Posted by SuperFemme

And that is why I use Bing vs. Google. It is much more reliable.

I too, Googled "Sexual Images of Children in the Media: Promoting Pedophilia?"

http://www.smh.com.au/business/media...1130-k178.html

http://www.hawaii.edu/hivandaids/Ped...e_Internet.pdf

http://americansfortruth.com/issues/pedophiliapederasty

http://www.etherzone.com/2010/mako011110.shtml

http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=27431 (this one is all about us gay pedophiles)

http://www.uri.edu/artsci/wms/hughes/ppitv.htm

Imagine my surprise when the planet didn't even show up on a search.

It's usually a good idea to actually read the articles one is posting, as the articles don't even correlate to the conversation

Except the one you posted about amercans for truth prattling on about how homos are pedophiles


Just Sayin',
Dylan

[Soon]

Originally Posted by Dylan

It's usually a good idea to actually read the articles one is posting, as the articles don't even correlate to the conversation

Except the one you posted about amercans for truth prattling on about how homos are pedophiles


Just Sayin',
Dylan

Even more interesting! I knew the Americans for Truth one would be trash, but I hadn't clicked on any of the sites yet.

I was just surprised that two different search engines could yield such different results.

So, if at least google came back with the this conversation, it is relevant to the topic at hand.

[SuperFemme]

Originally Posted by Dylan

It's usually a good idea to actually read the articles one is posting, as the articles don't even correlate to the conversation

Except the one you posted about amercans for truth prattling on about how homos are pedophiles


Just Sayin',
Dylan

See my edit oh Relevance Avenger.

Snort,
Adele

[Soon]

Originally Posted by Medusa

If you Google pretty much any of our thread titles and use the exact same or almost exact same verbiage, of course they will show up in Google.

I thought of that too--of course, after I got the results and actually looked at my key words and then the title of this thread!

I was still a bit surprised that the four key words of pedophilia, media, images and children (in my search) would make this site the first result b/c I presumed there would be a lot of articles/discussion/research on this topic that would give other sites primacy in the results.

Anyway, sorry for the derail.