![]()  | 
	
| 
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#1 | 
| 
			
			 Timed Out - TOS Drama 
			
			How Do You Identify?: 
... Preferred Pronoun?: 
			
				
			
			... Join Date: Nov 2009 
				Location: ... 
				
				
					Posts: 6,573
				 
				 
	Thanks: 30,737 
	
		
			
				Thanked 22,901 Times in 5,017 Posts
			
		
	 
				
				Rep Power: 0 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()  | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Canada Celebrates 10 Years Of Marriage  
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	Same-sex marriage became legal across Canada in July 2005. But that road to national equality began in ten years ago today in Toronto, when Joe Varnell and Kevin Bourassa were married in the Metropolitan Community Church, a ceremony that was later ruled legal when it was performed. Starting in 2003, with Ontario leading the way, province after province legalized same-sex marriage, ultimately resulting in the landmark Civil Marriage Act in 2005. Congratulations, Canada  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to MsTinkerbelly For This Useful Post: | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#2 | 
| 
			
			 Timed Out - TOS Drama 
			
			How Do You Identify?: 
... Preferred Pronoun?: 
			
				
			
			... Join Date: Nov 2009 
				Location: ... 
				
				
					Posts: 6,573
				 
				 
	Thanks: 30,737 
	
		
			
				Thanked 22,901 Times in 5,017 Posts
			
		
	 
				
				Rep Power: 0 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()  | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			The wheels here turn a little slower.... 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	DOJ Files DOMA Defense The Department of Justice yesterday filed its defense of the overturn of Section Three of the Defense of Marriage Act, which was ruled unconstitutional last July in Gill v. Office of Personnel Management and Massachusetts v. United States. A quote from the government's brief comes via Chris Geidner at Metro Weekly: DOMA is supported by rationales that constitute a sufficient rational basis for the law. For example, as explained below, it is supported by an interest in maintaining the status quo and uniformity on the federal level, and preserving room for the development of policy in the states. When DOMA was enacted, the institution of marriage had long been understood as a formal relationship between a man and a woman, and state and federal law had been built on that understanding. But our society is evolving, and as is well-established, the “science of government . . . is the science of experiment.” Over the years, the prevailing concept of marriage has been challenged as unfair to a significant element of the population. Recently there has been a growing recognition that the prevailing regime is harmful to gay and lesbian members of our society. Rather tepid, eh? Richard Socarides of the newly-formed Equality Matters responds. "There are some improvements in tone in the brief, but the bottom line is the government continues to oppose full equality for its gay citizens. And that is unacceptable. The administration claims that it has a duty to defend the laws that are on the books. We simply do not agree. At the very least, the Justice Department can and should acknowledge that the law is unconstitutional." And from GLAD, who won the case, we get this response via press release. The government’s appeal follows a decision issued on July 8, 2010 by federal District Court Judge Joseph L. Tauro in favor of GLAD’s plaintiffs, seven married couples and three widowers, who have been denied access to federal programs because of DOMA. In that decision, Judge Tauro concluded that DOMA is unconstitutional. “We see nothing really new in this brief, which reiterates many of the same arguments the government made in the District Court,” said Mary L. Bonauto, who is leading the DOMA team for GLAD. “We’re prepared to meet these arguments head-on, and bring to an end the discrimination that is suffered by married same-sex couples like our plaintiffs and that DOJ has admitted is caused by DOMA.”  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#3 | 
| 
			
			 Timed Out - TOS Drama 
			
			How Do You Identify?: 
... Preferred Pronoun?: 
			
				
			
			... Join Date: Nov 2009 
				Location: ... 
				
				
					Posts: 6,573
				 
				 
	Thanks: 30,737 
	
		
			
				Thanked 22,901 Times in 5,017 Posts
			
		
	 
				
				Rep Power: 0 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()  | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Yahoo...minutes ago 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	Court rejects appeal over DC gay marriage law WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court has rejected an appeal from opponents of same-sex marriage who want to overturn the District of Columbia's gay marriage law. The court did not comment Tuesday in turning away a challenge from a Maryland pastor and others who are trying to get a measure on the ballot to allow Washingtonians to vote on a measure that defines marriage as between a man and a woman. Bishop Harry Jackson led a lawsuit against the district's Board of Elections and Ethics after it refused to put that initiative on the ballot. The board ruled that the ballot question would in effect authorize discrimination. Last year, Washington began issuing marriage licenses for same-sex couples and in 2009, it began recognizing gay marriages performed elsewhere  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to MsTinkerbelly For This Useful Post: | 
![]()  | 
	
	
		
  | 
	
		
  |