Woman aims for 1,000 pound weight goal

[Cyclopea]

Six foot tall 115 lb models market themselves to the male gaze (and perfect women look like that- really!). Two girls one cup market themselves to the male gaze (and they were really into that hotness-slurpilicious! - really!). Women who can puke on command market themselves to male fetishists (and they love puking!-really!) The stripper at the corner bar markets herself to dudes that really think she is oh so into him as she puts her hand on his thigh for a buck (She's really into you! You're special!), Fat models market themselves to fat fetishists/feeders (She's so into it!). Entire cultures of women keep their faces covered because men are not responsible for their actions when faced with the "eroticism" of a female face and to do otherwise "invites" rape (the raped then punished by death for incitement). Nothing new. Not news.
The only thing unique and newsworthy about this story is fat fatty mcfatterson.

[suebee]

Originally Posted by Cyclopea

Six foot tall 115 lb models market themselves to the male gaze (and perfect women look like that- really!). Two girls one cup market themselves to the male gaze (and they were really into that hotness-slurpilicious! - really!). Women who can puke on command market themselves to male fetishists (and they love puking!-really!) The stripper at the corner bar markets herself to dudes that really think she is oh so into him as she puts her hand on his thigh for a buck (She's really into you! You're special!), Fat models market themselves to fat fetishists/feeders (She's so into it!). Entire cultures of women keep their faces covered because men are not responsible for their actions when faced with the "eroticism" of a female face and to do otherwise "invites" rape (the raped then punished by death for incitement). Nothing new. Not news.
The only thing unique and newsworthy about this story is fat fatty mcfatterson.

You had me right up to the "fat fatty mcfatterson".

[Cyclopea]

Originally Posted by cybersuebee

You had me right up to the "fat fatty mcfatterson".

hmmmm

[apretty]

Originally Posted by cybersuebee

You had me right up to the "fat fatty mcfatterson".

seriously, what was that.

[Cyclopea]

5 out of 1290 misunderstood my post. Not bad!

[Gayla]

Originally Posted by Cyclopea

5 out of 1290 misunderstood my post. Not bad!

The majority of your post made perfect sense and I imagine, like me, many nodded their heads in agreement. Until that ending part there. That part I don't understand.

[suebee]

Originally Posted by Cyclopea

5 out of 1290 misunderstood my post. Not bad!

First, I think you've got your stats reversed.

Second, enough people on this site have been called one of those names to recognize it for what it was.

[Bit]

Originally Posted by cybersuebee

First, I think you've got your stats reversed.

Second, enough people on this site have been called one of those names to recognize it for what it was.

Sue, I think Cyclopea probably forgot the quotation marks... I think the name calling was the reference to the way the media has sensationalized the story--in other words, I think it was an attempt to say that this story is "news" only because the media is branding Donna with the equivalent of the name.

[suebee]

Originally Posted by Bit

Sue, I think Cyclopea probably forgot the quotation marks... I think the name calling was the reference to the way the media has sensationalized the story--in other words, I think it was an attempt to say that this story is "news" only because the media is branding Donna with the equivalent of the name.

Ah. Well proper grammatical format is important after all in that case. N'est pas?

[Cyclopea]

Originally Posted by Bit

Sue, I think Cyclopea probably forgot the quotation marks... I think the name calling was the reference to the way the media has sensationalized the story--in other words, I think it was an attempt to say that this story is "news" only because the media is branding Donna with the equivalent of the name.

Thanks Bit! I thought it was clear and I'm glad you understood. A bit defeating when all the thoughts and ideas in a post are discarded because of poor punctuation! Oh well, that's the internetz! Or maybe nothing else was interesting in my posts.
Thank you for not only "getting" what I meant, but taking the time to explain it to those who were confused, and especially for then commenting on the meat of one of my posts.
Oh- and posting the link too!