![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
How Do You Identify?:
Femme Preferred Pronoun?:
She, please Relationship Status:
Loved Up Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Western MA
Posts: 2,183
Thanks: 9,001
Thanked 6,554 Times in 1,553 Posts
Rep Power: 21474853 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
__________________
I am made of stars |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
How Do You Identify?:
Femme Preferred Pronoun?:
She, please Relationship Status:
Loved Up Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Western MA
Posts: 2,183
Thanks: 9,001
Thanked 6,554 Times in 1,553 Posts
Rep Power: 21474853 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
The provision same-sex couples has definitely be thrown out of the bill. It makes me very sad. And it means that even more is riding on DOMA being overturned by SCOTUS; and (hoping for the best outcome) when that happens it still means a very long wait for those couples who are currently suffering, most of whom have waited a very long time already. DOMA being overturned won't magically create new laws, it only opens the door for their creation.
I'm saddened and sickened that YET AGAIN our community is a pawn in the political machinations, and an easily disposable one at that. ![]() http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/0...n_3315674.html
__________________
I am made of stars |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Sparkle For This Useful Post: |
![]() |
#3 | |
Senior Member
How Do You Identify?:
Queer Sapiosexual Femme Relationship Status:
Mrs. Grumpy Cat ![]() Tournaments Won: 4 Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: 8,660 feet high in the Andes
Posts: 2,640
Thanks: 10,519
Thanked 11,656 Times in 2,292 Posts
Rep Power: 21474852 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
I am so disappointed with this bill. It feels like the health care bill all over again where most of the good stuff gets sold out early on. I think most importantly, restoring due process to our deportation system and allowing a judge to review cases should not have been controversial. Secondly queers were thrown out, which is stupid and a loss because the current policy of the State department was to treat partners as family in at least deportation cases, though not for initial immigration. Brothers and sisters are no longer family in the eyes of Congress either. The number of highly skilled visas was not addressed. We have 30 engineering job openings for every one American engineer, but we constantly send a flood of engineers home after their student visas expire. I could gripe all day about this thing. The one positive thing I can say is that Democrats typically do incremental policy, so I hope this is something we will see evolve more in the near future. And I am glad the kids get to go to college. It used to be so heartbreaking to tell young people they weren't eligible for an education here. I hope many lives will be improved by this opportunity.
__________________
Small business owners around the world use microfinance to help expand their businesses and provide for their families. You can help! Click here to learn about Kiva. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Infamous Member
How Do You Identify?:
Transmasculine/Non-Binary Preferred Pronoun?:
Hy (Pronounced He) Relationship Status:
Married Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 6,589
Thanks: 21,132
Thanked 8,146 Times in 2,005 Posts
Rep Power: 21474858 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
Immigration Bill Amendment Would Carve Out Benefits For Some Same-Sex Couples
By Annie-Rose Strasser on Jun 12, 2013 at 9:40 am When the Gang of Eight’s immigration reform plan was considered before the Senate Judiciary Committee in May, LGBT advocates were heartbroken to watch as Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT) withdrew an amendment from the bill that would haven given the same immigration rights to bi-national same-sex couples that are enjoyed by their straight counterparts. But now, the amendment is back. Given the current Republican antipathy toward Leahy’s similar amendments in committee, however, (and its likely failure in the House, even if it passes the Senate), immigrant same-sex couples face a long road ahead. http://thinkprogress.org/immigration...igration-bill/
__________________
Sometimes you don't realize your own strength until you come face to face with your greatest weakness. - Susan Gale |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Greyson For This Useful Post: |
![]() |
#5 | |
Infamous Member
How Do You Identify?:
Transmasculine/Non-Binary Preferred Pronoun?:
Hy (Pronounced He) Relationship Status:
Married Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 6,589
Thanks: 21,132
Thanked 8,146 Times in 2,005 Posts
Rep Power: 21474858 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
But, this is not the first time our courts make decisions that seem opposed to the constitution. DOMA was a perfect example. Until DOMA the Federal government left it up to the States to decide matters of marriage and divorce. Historically it came under "States Rights." Also, States would honor, recognize all marriages from any state and then afford legal status to their union when in a state that did not perform the marriage. All of that was not the case for interracial couples until Loving vs. Virginia in 1967. Now we shall see how each state decides to Queer marriages. There are still 37 states the define marriage as "One Man and One Woman." This past Sunday I did speak to a diverse group of people primarily made up of straight white middle and upper class and there was representation from Latino, African American, LGBTQ and poor people. I addressed Immigration Reform. I reminded them that Senator Marco Rubio was doing every thing he could to keep Immigration Reform out of the reach of Same-Sex couples and families during this latest change in our immigration laws. I am hoping the overruling of DOMA will now settle that particular immigration injustice. Our time is here. Never give up on humanity for all. Does anyone have any clarification, analysis regarding how overruling DOMA impacts Immigration Law for LGBTQ? Timeline for Interracial Marriage in USA: http://civilliberty.about.com/od/rac...y-Timeline.htm Timeline for LGBTQ Marriage in USA: http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/...95P07320130626
__________________
Sometimes you don't realize your own strength until you come face to face with your greatest weakness. - Susan Gale Last edited by Greyson; 06-26-2013 at 12:22 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Greyson For This Useful Post: |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
How Do You Identify?:
Femme Preferred Pronoun?:
She, please Relationship Status:
Loved Up Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Western MA
Posts: 2,183
Thanks: 9,001
Thanked 6,554 Times in 1,553 Posts
Rep Power: 21474853 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
PRESS RELEASE by the DOMA PROJECT
SUPREME COURT STRIKES DOWN ANTI-GAY “DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE ACT” IN HISTORIC RULING MARRIAGES OF SAME-SEX COUPLES NOW RECOGNIZED BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY Gay American Citizens Can Now Sponsor Foreign-Born Spouses for Green Cards, Ending Immigration Nightmare In a groundbreaking and historic ruling, the Supreme Court of the United States has placed itself on the right side of history and found Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) to be an unconstitutional exercise of federal authority and a violation of the equal protection guarantee of the U.S. Constitution in a 5-4 decision authored by Justice Kennedy. Originally signed into law by President Bill Clinton in 1996, DOMA has denied lawfully married gay and lesbian couples from the benefits and protections of more than 1,100 federal provisions. These wide-ranging benefits include all of immigration law and the right of an American citizen to sponsor his or her spouse for a green card and to file a fiancé(e) visa petition to bring his or her partner to the United States. Writing for the Court, Justice Kennedy stated unequivocally that, "The federal statute is invalid, for no legitimate purpose overcomes the purpose and effect to disparage and injure those whom the State, by its marriage laws, sought to protect in personhood and dignity. By seeking to displace this protection and treating those persons as living in marriages less respected than others, the federal statute is in violation of the Fifth Amendment." The DOMA Project has filed over 70 green card and fiancé(e) visa petitions for same-sex couples since its inception in 2010. The sole basis for denial by the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) was Section 3 of DOMA. After today's ruling, that obstacle has, at long last, been removed. Lavi Soloway, gay rights attorney and co-founder of the DOMA Project, offers his view on the ruling: "Today’s historic ruling puts millions of lesbian and gay Americans and their families on equal footing under federal law. By ending thediscrimination against married same-sex couples, the Supreme Court has extended the promise of equality granted by the U.S. Constitution to all Americans regardless of sexual orientation. Beginning today, lesbian and gay Americans will be able to file green card petitions for their foreign-born spouses and fiancé(e) visa petitions to bring their partners to the United States. The federal government will no longer stand in the way of lesbian and gay binational couples who seek nothing more than to build a life together in the United States. The Supreme Court’s ruling is the culmination of years of the tireless efforts of courageous and determined couples who stood up for the right to be together, and fought back against a government that sought to tear apart their families. We expect the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services to begin approving green card petitions for married lesbian and gay couples immediately.” The defeat of DOMA effectively means the end to deportation of spouses of gay and lesbian Americans who will now be eligible for green cards. It will reunite same-sex couples who have been torn apart and forced to live in separate countries, including many cases in which parents have been separated from their minor children, and it will end the exile of gay and lesbian Americans who have been forced to live abroad in order to be with the person they love. With Section 3 of DOMA gone, our family-based immigration laws will now treat all families equally, regardless of sexual orientation. I've been weeping (happy tears) all morning for every binational couple who's life this will change.
__________________
I am made of stars |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Sparkle For This Useful Post: |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
How Do You Identify?:
TransgenderMasculineQueer Preferred Pronoun?:
H with a y Relationship Status:
fluxing the solder. ![]() Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 484
Thanks: 1,964
Thanked 835 Times in 184 Posts
Rep Power: 7482394 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to blackboot For This Useful Post: |
![]() |
|
|