![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Junior Member
How Do You Identify?:
Stone Butch.............. Preferred Pronoun?:
No preference............... Relationship Status:
single............... Join Date: May 2017
Location: Washington..................
Posts: 35
Thanks: 0
Thanked 135 Times in 31 Posts
Rep Power: 445522 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
My apologies for the error in term, as I said I am not super familiar with the subject in general, and am trying to understand. As I said, I do agree that the youth should be competing with the other boys, I was just curious if the specific case actually involved an advantage to the degree that he title should be taken away. (I was not successful at gaining the information I felt was necessary to actually make a judgement call in this specific case) Many cisgender girls use organic dietary supplements that allow them to gain larger muscle mass. I have heard of cases where their titles were challenged for unfair advantage, but no of none where someone's title was stripped. (This does not include steroid use, that is always a no, no and cause for disqualification from competition and removal of any titles gained) Anyway, I am wondering if use of such dietary supplements should also be considered unfair and be banned. My major concern is that people may try to exclude transgender youth from competition entirely (which would be completely wrong) instead of considering each case individually. The best and obvious solution is to allow transgender youth to compete with the appropriate biological gender (i.e. FtM with biological males, and MtF with biological girls) Note: If my terminology is incorrect or offensive, please let me know as I have no desire to offend, just to gain understanding. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to StoicStone For This Useful Post: |
|
|