|  | 
|  08-31-2011, 08:11 PM | #11 | 
| Timed Out - Permanent How Do You Identify?: decidedly indifferent Preferred Pronoun?: other Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: Patrick Springs, VA 
					Posts: 2,812
				 Thanks: 9,247 
		
			
				Thanked 5,700 Times in 1,682 Posts
			
		
	Rep Power: 0            |   
			
			I think and have always understood the definition of lesbian to be a word of action. Lesbians "actively" ( vigorously and lovingly) have sex with other women.  There is another word for women/ females who actively have sex with women AND men. That word is bisexual. Most folks I know who engage in sex with women, men and trans-persons call themselves "queer" or "pansexual". This makes sense to me. I get it. I honor it. I respect it. What is beginning to bother me a great deal, is that all of the sudden I feel like being bisexual is bad. Or being queer is bad or pansexual. Why not use the words already there? What is wrong with being bisexual? I don't have issue with how anyone else decides to id themselves. I ain't sleepin with ya, so why should I care? Except, in the realm of issues Kobi mentioned above. On a personal level, call yourself avacado if you so desire, but on a political level, can we please decide on which version of the English language we are going to use? It would just help in the long run. | 
|   |   | 
| The Following User Says Thank You to Jess For This Useful Post: | 
| 
 | 
 |