Sexual Images of Children in the Media: Promoting Pedophilia?

[Dylan]

Originally Posted by The_Lady_Snow

I don't see where a BIG DEAL was made....

but ok...

I still think the images are a stepping stone to these fuckers getting off when they can't find someone or an image on the internets.

*shrugs*

I don't disagree with you at all.

But didn't you also say your family member used the Sears catalog?

Pedophiles aren't going to stop being pedophiles just because we take little kids outta skimpy clothes.

And I'm not saying we shouldn't be concerned about the sexualization of (predominantly female) children. I think it's completely gross.


I Really Don't Think Anyone Disagrees With What You're Saying,
Dylan

[The_Lady_Snow]

Originally Posted by Dylan

I don't disagree with you at all.

But didn't you also say your family member used the Sears catalog?

Pedophiles aren't going to stop being pedophiles just because we take little kids outta skimpy clothes.

And I'm not saying we shouldn't be concerned about the sexualization of (predominantly female) children. I think it's completely gross.


I Really Don't Think Anyone Disagrees With What You're Saying,
Dylan

That I did...

When he wasn't chasing me around the fucking house.

[Lady Pamela]

Originally Posted by Dylan

I don't disagree with you at all.

But didn't you also say your family member used the Sears catalog?

Pedophiles aren't going to stop being pedophiles just because we take little kids outta skimpy clothes.

And I'm not saying we shouldn't be concerned about the sexualization of (predominantly female) children. I think it's completely gross.


I Really Don't Think Anyone Disagrees With What You're Saying,
Dylan

You are correct in the fact it won't stop the twisted sick people from being just that...
But

It will stop exposer to entice them everytime they turn around.
It will atleast slow the reactions because it isn't being promoted everyday
It will also perhaps save one or more children or youth from having to endure a lifetime of hell.

It is true that they may find resources elsewhere
But to take it out of the lime light will definately slow it down at the very least.

They have tests they run on offenders now which prove that magazines,pictures of children in risky clothes, etc
Excite them.
They are using this more and more to determine the type of petifile these people are once the are caught.

Those tests all by themselves prove that when shown a pic...The body reacts...And in a sick mind..They react in a sick fashion.

In my opinion

[SuperFemme]

Originally Posted by Greyson

I have never jumped into Julie's online posting. I know she is a full grown adult woman and can handle herself. I am going to comment now because I do have real time exposure to Julie because we have been dating for almost 18 months now. I met Julie when she was at the beginning of a very contentious divorce and that legal matter is still unresolved.

Why am I spelling such personal matters out here in a post? Because what you don't know nor should you have had any reason to know, is that Julie's soon to be ex-husband stalks her postings and mine on both this site and the Dash site. He attempts to enter some of the posts made by both of us into the public court record of this pending divorce.

Julie did not ask me to make this post. I am doing this on my own volition. I do not want her ex to in any way misunderstand, take out of context, what was posted here by Julie. I have seen Julie with her daughter on a very regular basis. Julie does not condone pedophilia. Nor does she think it is okay for children to dress in a provocative manner.

I believe some of Julie's posting may have been taken out of context. IMO it is easy to do when all communication is purely in written form. I also know that some of us here, are survivors of some sort of childhood sexual abuse. I know for me, I sometimes get very triggered when I perceive even the slightest condoning of using children, male or female as sexual objects in any way. My perceptions can push my buttons big time.

Please, you do not have to agree with me or Julie and our views. Again, I am attempting to be very clear that Julie does not parent her daughter in any way that condones pedophilia or any other illegal and damaging behavior that would hurt her daughter.

I don't think there is any way that anyone could read any of Ms. Julies posts and for a hot second think that she condones children as sexual objects.

Nothing she said even comes close to that.

Conversely, as somebody who has gone through a very ugly custody battle? I'd like to remind you that what you post here is public. Because of that it's admissible. Proceed accordingly.

[The_Lady_Snow]

Originally Posted by Greyson

I have never jumped into Julie's online posting. I know she is a full grown adult woman and can handle herself. I am going to comment now because I do have real time exposure to Julie because we have been dating for almost 18 months now. I met Julie when she was at the beginning of a very contentious divorce and that legal matter is still unresolved.

Why am I spelling such personal matters out here in a post? Because what you don't know nor should you have had any reason to know, is that Julie's soon to be ex-husband stalks her postings and mine on both this site and the Dash site. He attempts to enter some of the posts made by both of us into the public court record of this pending divorce.

Julie did not ask me to make this post. I am doing this on my own volition. I do not want her ex to in any way misunderstand, take out of context, what was posted here by Julie. I have seen Julie with her daughter on a very regular basis. Julie does not condone pedophilia. Nor does she think it is okay for children to dress in a provocative manner.

I believe some of Julie's posting may have been taken out of context. IMO it is easy to do when all communication is purely in written form. I also know that some of us here, are survivors of some sort of childhood sexual abuse. I know for me, I sometimes get very triggered when I perceive even the slightest condoning of using children, male or female as sexual objects in any way. My perceptions can push my buttons big time.

Please, you do not have to agree with me or Julie and our views. Again, I am attempting to be very clear that Julie does not parent her daughter in any way that condones pedophilia or any other illegal and damaging behavior that would hurt her daughter.

I don't believe anyone was saying julie is a bad parent or one that condones pedophilia.

Snow

who knows about custody battles and such

PS

Does this mean we can't ever have a discussion with julie again??? I don't get you coming in here I really don't.

[The_Lady_Snow]

I gotta add after reading the rep notes..

The ex isn't gonna come after julie cause of her BFP postings, and all that, it's gonna be the fact she is with some queer.

I know this for the fact my ex husband tries that shit all the time. His beef is the fact she is in your bed..

Sucks but it's true