![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: What is your ststus? | |||
| I am unmarried in my State or Country |
|
103 | 58.52% |
| I am married in my State or Country |
|
27 | 15.34% |
| I have had an alternate joining which is not legally marriage |
|
18 | 10.23% |
| I wouldn't get married if they paid me! |
|
28 | 15.91% |
| Voters: 176. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
How Do You Identify?:
queer stone femme shark baby girl Preferred Pronoun?:
she, her, little one Relationship Status:
dating myself. ![]() Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: dallas, tx
Posts: 1,495
Thanks: 13,823
Thanked 6,440 Times in 1,288 Posts
Rep Power: 21474851 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
it upsets me that it's either/or. there are plenty of other ways the government can provide those rights without taking such a religious, moralizing stance on who deserves to receive them and who doesn't. imho it would be better to reform the way those benefits are allotted altogether and separate them from the romantic commitment or religious aspects of marriage - i.e. provide civil unions/domestic partnership benefits to people in committed relationships regardless of gender, sexual orientation, or monogamy/nonmonogamy - then leave it up to individual churches, temples, and other religious institutions or people who perform civil ceremonies as to whether they choose to perform the ceremony for a certain couple.
|
|
|
|
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to aishah For This Useful Post: |
![]() |
|
|