Latinos and Blacks Missing in Occupy Wall Street 
José Fernando López
                                 Editor in Chief, PODER Magazine
Days before the arrest of 700 people in the Brooklyn Bridge in New York, I read in the 
El Pais newspaper,  from Spain, an article about the Occupy Wall Street movement. Until the  arrest, except for acknowledging certain fleeting appearances on  record, such as the one from Michael Moore or Susan Sarandon, newspapers  in this country had not given much importance to the protests taking  place in the heart of Manhattan. 
El Pais, however, has followed  the issue with interest from the beginning (mid-September), for its  resemblance to the movement of the Indignados (Indignants) that shook  Spain a few months ago.
 
In the 
El Pais article, my attention was caught by a quote from  Gonzalo Venegas, a musician from the Bronx, who was going for the first  time to the Zuccotti Park, the center of the protest given the police  barrier of Wall Street. 
"Here," said Venegas, "Latinos and blacks are missing." Maybe,  I said to myself while reading such a blunt assertion, it's because the  movement has nothing to do with them. But looking more closely at the  reasons for the protest, it became clear that it did.
 
The United States is experiencing the worst economic crisis of the last  eighty years, due largely in part to the greed of banks and the lack of  regulation of the financial system. And that crisis has not only swept  away millions of jobs, but threatens to reduce social benefits -- in  addition to those that lost their homes after the bursting of the  housing bubble.
 
The responsibility for the financial system has been pointed out by tens  of experts. But none have highlighted that responsibility as the  government itself, which after handing out millions of dollars belonging  to the taxpayers to the banks -- to avoid a debacle -- decided to sue  17 of them for having "cheated," according to them, state agencies  Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac by selling toxic mortgages to them.
 
According to 
an article in The Wall Street Journal,  the Federal Housing Finance Agency, which was the official agency that  brought the lawsuit, "said the mortgage-backed securities were sold to  Fannie and Freddie based on documents that 'contained misstatements and  omissions of material facts concerning the quality of the underlying  mortgage loans, the creditworthiness of the Borrowers, and the practices  used to originate such loan'."
 
It is no secret that the toxic mortgages -- and the practices followed  to originate the loans -- are a great part of the origin of the crisis,  and it is against these practices, among others, that the organizers of  Occupy Wall Street protest. Well, according to a 
recent study by the Pew Research Center, Hispanics and blacks are among the groups most affected by the mortgage crisis.
 
According to the study, "in percentage terms, the bursting of the  housing market bubble in 2006 and the recession that followed from late  2007 to mid-2009 took a far greater toll on the wealth of minorities  than on whites. From 2005 to 2009, inflation-adjusted median wealth fell  by 66% among Hispanic households and 53% among black households,  compared with just 16% among white households". And "about a third of  black (35%) and Hispanic (31%) households had zero or negative net worth  in 2009, compared with 15% of white households".
  I'm not sure that a protest movement like Occupy Wall Street is the  best way to prevent this sort of thing from happening again. But after  analyzing the causes for the protest and the impact the crisis has had  on minorities, I understood Venegas' phrase better. For Hispanics living  in the United States, and for those seeking to capture their vote in  the upcoming elections, there are few issues that should be as important  than the issue of migration.